BallKnowMe college football, by the numbers

Player ratings 2025 season

These are 2025 grades, not 2026.

2026 hasn’t been played and no source has published 2026 rosters yet, so there is nothing to grade for this year. Showing last season’s number as if it described this year’s team would be guessing. These update once real rosters and real games arrive.

All positions QB RB WR TE OL DL LB DB K P All D1 FBS FCS
Pos rankPlayerPosSchool GradeG2025 season
#1 Rasheem Biles LB Pittsburgh FBS 99 9 84 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 12.0 TFL
#2 Kam Robinson LB Virginia FBS 98 7 64 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.5 TFL
#3 Caden Fordham LB NC State FBS 95 12 130 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 8.5 TFL
#4 Owen Long LB Colorado State FBS 94 12 151 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL
#5 Bryun Parham LB UConn FBS 93 12 116 tkl · 10.5 sacks · 14.5 TFL
#6 Jacob Rodriguez LB Texas Tech FBS 92 13 117 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 11.0 TFL
#7 John Miller LB Utah State FBS 91 12 109 tkl · 7.5 sacks · 9.5 TFL
#8 Red Murdock LB Buffalo FBS 90 12 142 tkl · 5.0 sacks · 13.5 TFL
#9 Mac Harris LB South Florida FBS 90 12 100 tkl · 6.0 sacks · 7.5 TFL
#10 Xavier Atkins LB Auburn FBS 89 12 84 tkl · 9.0 sacks · 17.0 TFL
#11 Kaleb Elarms-Orr LB TCU FBS 88 12 119 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 9.5 TFL
#12 Jordan Kwiatkowski LB Central Michigan FBS 88 12 105 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 12.5 TFL
#13 Mani Powell LB Purdue FBS 88 12 110 tkl · 5.0 sacks · 12.0 TFL
#14 Keyshaun Elliott LB Arizona State FBS 87 12 98 tkl · 7.0 sacks · 14.0 TFL
#15 Gideon Lampron LB Bowling Green FBS 87 12 119 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 17.5 TFL
#16 Quinn Urwiler LB Northern Illinois FBS 86 12 141 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 7.5 TFL
#17 Corban Hondru LB Miami (OH) FBS 86 10 83 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL
#18 Sammy Brown LB Clemson FBS 86 12 91 tkl · 5.0 sacks · 12.5 TFL
#19 Micah Davey LB UTEP FBS 85 11 131 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 9.0 TFL
#20 Jaden Dugger LB Louisiana FBS 85 12 118 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 11.0 TFL
#21 Chris Jones LB Southern Miss FBS 85 12 127 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 7.5 TFL
#22 Jhalyn Shuler LB South Florida FBS 85 12 95 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 6.5 TFL
#23 Ray Coney LB Tulsa FBS 84 12 128 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 7.0 TFL
#24 Jordan Pollard LB San José State FBS 84 12 108 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL
#25 Baron Hopson LB Kennesaw State FBS 84 13 126 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 8.5 TFL
#26 Owen Chambliss LB San Diego State FBS 84 12 105 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 10.0 TFL
#27 Sam Brumfield LB Memphis FBS 83 12 106 tkl · 4.5 sacks · 13.0 TFL
#28 Kyle Louis LB Pittsburgh FBS 83 10 79 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 8.0 TFL
#29 Timmy Hinspeter LB Massachusetts FBS 83 7 69 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#30 Oumar Diomande LB UConn FBS 83 12 111 tkl · 5.0 sacks · 8.0 TFL
#31 Desmond Purnell LB Kansas State FBS 82 12 72 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 8.5 TFL
#32 Colin Simmons LB Texas FBS 82 11 41 tkl · 11.0 sacks · 13.5 TFL
#33 Matt Rose LB Stanford FBS 82 12 106 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 8.0 TFL
#34 Kolbe Fields LB Louisiana Tech FBS 82 5 39 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#35 Cade Uluave LB California FBS 82 11 88 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 11.5 TFL
#36 Rolijah Hardy LB Indiana FBS 82 13 87 tkl · 8.0 sacks · 13.0 TFL
#37 Anthony Hill Jr. LB Texas FBS 82 10 70 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 7.0 TFL
#38 Daniel Wingate LB Maryland FBS 81 12 102 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 6.5 TFL
#39 Keaton Thomas LB Baylor FBS 81 12 105 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 7.0 TFL
#40 Andon Thomas LB Army FBS 81 12 108 tkl · 3.5 TFL
#41 Jake Golday LB Cincinnati FBS 81 12 104 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 6.0 TFL
#42 Amare Campbell LB Penn State FBS 81 12 96 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 9.5 TFL
#43 Dorian Pringle LB Bowling Green FBS 80 3 27 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 6.0 TFL
#44 Josiah Trotter LB Missouri FBS 80 12 84 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 13.0 TFL
#45 Charles Correa LB Purdue FBS 80 12 93 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 7.5 TFL
#46 Bronson Olevao Jr. LB Utah State FBS 80 12 83 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 7.5 TFL
#47 Bryce Boettcher LB Oregon FBS 80 12 104 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#48 Colton Phares LB App State FBS 80 12 89 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 9.0 TFL
#49 Trey Lathan LB Kansas FBS 80 12 86 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 7.0 TFL
#50 Jordan Stringer LB Troy FBS 80 13 107 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 11.0 TFL

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Offensive line grades are team-inferred: college football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so those rows carry the team’s offensive rating and are flagged, not a measurement of the player. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.