Player ratings 2025 season

These are 2025 grades, not 2026.

2026 hasn’t been played and no source has published 2026 rosters yet, so there is nothing to grade for this year. Showing last season’s number as if it described this year’s team would be guessing. These update once real rosters and real games arrive.

Pos rankPlayerPosSchool GradeG2025 season
#1 Michael Trigg TE Baylor FBS 99 11 50 rec · 694 yds · 6 TD
#2 Eli Stowers TE Vanderbilt FBS 94 12 62 rec · 769 yds · 4 TD
#3 Tanner Koziol TE Houston FBS 92 12 65 rec · 651 yds · 5 TD
#4 Trey'Dez Green TE LSU FBS 90 7 29 rec · 353 yds · 5 TD
#5 Kenyon Sadiq TE Oregon FBS 89 11 40 rec · 490 yds · 8 TD
#6 Dylan Wade TE UCF FBS 88 10 43 rec · 523 yds · 5 TD
#7 Justin Joly TE NC State FBS 87 11 47 rec · 468 yds · 7 TD
#8 Rocky Beers TE Colorado State FBS 86 9 31 rec · 388 yds · 7 TD
#9 Brody Foley TE Tulsa FBS 85 11 37 rec · 528 yds · 7 TD
#10 Terrance Carter Jr. TE Texas Tech FBS 85 11 46 rec · 552 yds · 5 TD
#11 Garrett Oakley TE Kansas State FBS 84 10 38 rec · 389 yds · 6 TD
#12 Chris Corbo TE Dartmouth FCS 84 10 45 rec · 516 yds · 4 TD
#13 Dorian Thomas TE New Mexico FBS 83 12 53 rec · 545 yds · 4 TD
#14 Seamus Gilmartin TE Harvard FCS 83 8 29 rec · 383 yds · 5 TD
#15 Ryder Kurtz TE Cornell FCS 82 10 43 rec · 514 yds · 4 TD
#16 Connor Hulstein TE Marist FCS 82 12 42 rec · 599 yds · 7 TD
#17 Travaunta Abner TE Alabama A&M FCS 81 7 35 rec · 380 yds · 3 TD
#18 Sam Roush TE Stanford FBS 81 11 49 rec · 545 yds · 2 TD
#19 Boden Groen TE Kansas FBS 81 11 36 rec · 450 yds · 5 TD
#20 Dallen Bentley TE Utah FBS 80 12 42 rec · 514 yds · 5 TD
#21 Benjamin Brahmer TE Iowa State FBS 80 12 37 rec · 446 yds · 6 TD
#22 Seydou Traore TE Mississippi State FBS 80 10 34 rec · 358 yds · 5 TD
#23 Chamon Metayer TE Arizona State FBS 80 10 38 rec · 375 yds · 4 TD
#24 Peter Clarke TE Temple FBS 79 11 30 rec · 483 yds · 6 TD
#25 Rohan Jones TE Arkansas FBS 79 10 19 rec · 519 yds · 4 TD
#26 Dae'Quan Wright TE Ole Miss FBS 79 11 30 rec · 489 yds · 4 TD
#27 Ryan Osborne TE Harvard FCS 78 4 10 rec · 229 yds · 3 TD
#28 Eric Olsen TE Utah Tech FCS 78 12 51 rec · 566 yds · 2 TD
#29 Ethan Davis TE Tennessee FBS 78 6 21 rec · 257 yds · 2 TD
#30 Mason Mini TE California FBS 78 10 35 rec · 387 yds · 4 TD
#31 Josh Cuevas TE Alabama FBS 78 10 30 rec · 341 yds · 4 TD
#32 Juice Vereen TE UConn FBS 77 8 22 rec · 310 yds · 5 TD
#33 Jeremiah Franklin TE Boston College FBS 77 12 48 rec · 489 yds · 2 TD
#34 Jackson Blee TE William & Mary FCS 77 7 25 rec · 311 yds · 3 TD
#35 Chaz Middleton TE Robert Morris FCS 77 9 22 rec · 370 yds · 5 TD
#36 Eli Raridon TE Notre Dame FBS 76 9 32 rec · 482 yds
#37 Izayah Cummings TE App State FBS 76 8 37 rec · 374 yds · 1 TD
#38 Jeremiah Hasley TE Duke FBS 76 12 34 rec · 404 yds · 5 TD
#39 Carsen Ryan TE BYU FBS 76 12 37 rec · 500 yds · 3 TD
#40 Nathan Levicki TE Presbyterian FCS 76 12 33 rec · 478 yds · 6 TD
#41 Lance Mason TE Wisconsin FBS 76 11 30 rec · 398 yds · 4 TD
#42 Matthew Hibner TE SMU FBS 75 10 29 rec · 351 yds · 4 TD
#43 Darrin Fugitt TE Lindenwood FCS 75 8 32 rec · 341 yds · 2 TD
#44 Lake McRee TE USC FBS 75 12 30 rec · 450 yds · 4 TD
#45 Grant Hollier TE Georgia State FBS 75 8 21 rec · 288 yds · 4 TD
#46 Dorian Fleming TE Maryland FBS 75 11 40 rec · 351 yds · 3 TD
#47 DeShawn Hanika TE Kansas FBS 74 4 10 rec · 97 yds · 3 TD
#48 Jaxxon Warren TE Colorado State FBS 74 2 7 rec · 95 yds · 1 TD
#49 Jack Velling TE Michigan State FBS 74 11 36 rec · 359 yds · 3 TD
#50 Bruin Fleischmann TE Air Force FBS 74 11 21 rec · 370 yds · 6 TD

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Offensive line grades are team-inferred: college football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so those rows carry the team’s offensive rating and are flagged, not a measurement of the player. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.