BallKnowMe college football, by the numbers

Player ratings 2025 season

These are 2025 grades, not 2026.

2026 hasn’t been played and no source has published 2026 rosters yet, so there is nothing to grade for this year. Showing last season’s number as if it described this year’s team would be guessing. These update once real rosters and real games arrive.

All positions QB RB WR TE OL DL LB DB K P All D1 FBS FCS
Pos rankPlayerPosSchool GradeG2025 season
#1 Ahmaad Moses DB SMU FBS 99 12 91 tkl · 2 PD · 5 INT
#2 Dalton Johnson DB Arizona FBS 99 12 97 tkl · 7 PD · 4 INT
#3 Boogie Trotter DB Marshall FBS 98 12 73 tkl · 5 PD · 5 INT
#4 Jacob Fields DB Louisiana Tech FBS 96 12 91 tkl · 5 PD · 3 INT
#5 Ian Foster DB Southern Miss FBS 95 12 75 tkl · 7 PD · 3 INT
#6 Alex McLaughlin DB Washington FBS 94 12 90 tkl · 6 PD · 2 INT
#7 Brevin Hamblin DB Utah State FBS 93 12 102 tkl · 6 PD · 1 INT
#8 Noah Avinger DB Utah State FBS 92 12 84 tkl · 10 PD · 3 INT
#9 Eli Blakey DB Miami (OH) FBS 92 13 105 tkl · 8 PD · 2 INT
#10 Aamaris Brown DB UNLV FBS 91 10 42 tkl · 7 PD · 4 INT
#11 Robert Fitzgerald DB Northwestern FBS 91 12 109 tkl · 3 PD · 1 INT
#12 Keionte Scott DB Miami FBS 90 10 44 tkl · 5 PD · 1 INT
#13 Naeten Mitchell DB New Mexico State FBS 90 12 93 tkl · 7 PD · 3 INT
#14 Tahj Ra-El DB Purdue FBS 90 12 110 tkl · 5 PD
#15 Faletau Satuala DB BYU FBS 89 12 74 tkl · 3 PD · 3 INT
#16 Nick Andersen DB Wake Forest FBS 89 12 95 tkl · 7 PD
#17 Chris Johnson DB San Diego State FBS 89 11 48 tkl · 8 PD · 4 INT
#18 Marcus Neal Jr. DB Iowa State FBS 88 12 77 tkl · 3 PD · 2 INT
#19 Lemondre Joe DB Colorado State FBS 88 11 56 tkl · 13 PD
#20 Bryce Llewellyn DB Eastern Michigan FBS 88 12 102 tkl · 4 PD · 2 INT
#21 Zach Lutmer DB Iowa FBS 88 12 68 tkl · 6 PD · 3 INT
#22 John Nestor DB Minnesota FBS 87 10 47 tkl · 6 PD · 5 INT
#23 Jamel Johnson DB TCU FBS 87 12 89 tkl · 3 PD · 4 INT
#24 CJ Young DB Kent State FBS 87 11 89 tkl · 3 PD · 1 INT
#25 Bud Clark DB TCU FBS 86 10 54 tkl · 5 PD · 4 INT
#26 Drue Watts DB Memphis FBS 86 12 69 tkl · 2 PD
#27 Parker Robertson DB Oklahoma State FBS 86 12 77 tkl · 5 PD · 2 INT
#28 Isaiah Nwokobia DB SMU FBS 86 11 80 tkl · 7 PD · 2 INT
#29 Caden Dowler DB Montana State FCS 86 6 22 tkl · 6 INT
#30 Bishop Fitzgerald DB USC FBS 86 10 51 tkl · 3 PD · 5 INT
#31 Jonnie Wiltshire DB North Dakota FCS 85 5 14 tkl · 5 PD · 3 INT
#32 Ty Benefield DB Boise State FBS 85 13 98 tkl · 2 PD · 2 INT
#33 Mister Clark DB Florida International FBS 85 12 59 tkl · 13 PD · 3 INT
#34 Kani Walker DB Arkansas FBS 85 11 52 tkl · 11 PD · 1 INT
#35 A.J. Haulcy DB LSU FBS 85 12 89 tkl · 4 PD · 3 INT
#36 Chris Bracy DB Memphis FBS 84 12 74 tkl · 8 PD · 1 INT
#37 Davaughn Patterson DB Wake Forest FBS 84 12 78 tkl · 9 PD
#38 Malachi McLean DB UConn FBS 84 9 79 tkl · 2 PD · 1 INT
#39 Jaquez White DB Troy FBS 84 13 65 tkl · 11 PD · 3 INT
#40 Devin Lafayette DB Troy FBS 84 13 104 tkl · 4 PD · 2 INT
#41 Vito Tisdale DB Eastern Kentucky FCS 84 4 3 tkl · 2 PD · 4 INT
#42 Emmanuel McNeil-Warren DB Toledo FBS 84 12 73 tkl · 5 PD · 2 INT
#43 Collin Matteson DB Army FBS 83 11 75 tkl · 7 PD · 1 INT
#44 Tae Johnson DB Notre Dame FBS 83 10 48 tkl · 3 PD · 4 INT
#45 Jakobe Thomas DB Miami FBS 83 11 48 tkl · 4 PD · 4 INT
#46 Fred Perry DB West Virginia FBS 83 12 78 tkl · 3 PD
#47 Tawfiq Byard DB Colorado FBS 83 12 79 tkl · 4 PD · 1 INT
#48 Austin Brawley DB New Mexico FBS 83 4 21 tkl · 2 PD · 3 INT
#49 Bryce Thornton DB Florida FBS 83 11 56 tkl · 6 PD · 1 INT
#50 Genesis Smith DB Arizona FBS 82 12 77 tkl · 8 PD · 1 INT

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Offensive line grades are team-inferred: college football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so those rows carry the team’s offensive rating and are flagged, not a measurement of the player. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.