BallKnowMe college football, by the numbers

Player ratings 2025 season

These are 2025 grades, not 2026.

2026 hasn’t been played and no source has published 2026 rosters yet, so there is nothing to grade for this year. Showing last season’s number as if it described this year’s team would be guessing. These update once real rosters and real games arrive.

All positions QB RB WR TE OL DL LB DB K P All D1 FBS FCS
Pos rankPlayerPosSchool GradeG2025 season
#1 Lucas Carneiro K Ole Miss FBS 97 12 22 FG · 48 XP · 114 pts
#2 Aidan Birr K Georgia Tech FBS 92 12 25 FG · 42 XP · 117 pts
#3 Trey Butkowski K Pittsburgh FBS 89 10 19 FG · 41 XP · 98 pts
#4 Nico Radicic K Indiana FBS 87 13 15 FG · 71 XP · 116 pts
#5 Chris Freeman K UConn FBS 86 12 22 FG · 51 XP · 117 pts
#6 Kansei Matsuzawa K Hawai'i FBS 85 12 25 FG · 37 XP · 112 pts
#7 Will Ferrin K BYU FBS 84 13 22 FG · 47 XP · 113 pts
#8 Nico Gramatica K South Florida FBS 83 12 17 FG · 58 XP · 109 pts
#9 Will Bettridge K Virginia FBS 82 13 22 FG · 48 XP · 114 pts
#10 Tate Sandell K Oklahoma FBS 82 12 23 FG · 32 XP · 101 pts
#11 Michael Salgado-Medina K Arizona FBS 81 12 19 FG · 46 XP · 103 pts
#12 Max Gilbert K Tennessee FBS 80 12 14 FG · 60 XP · 102 pts
#13 Cooper Ranvier K Louisville FBS 80 12 21 FG · 36 XP · 99 pts
#14 Connor Hawkins K Baylor FBS 79 11 18 FG · 37 XP · 91 pts
#15 Patrick Durkin K Tulane FBS 79 13 24 FG · 40 XP · 112 pts
#16 Tyler Robles K Texas State FBS 78 12 19 FG · 48 XP · 105 pts
#17 Stone Harrington K Texas Tech FBS 78 13 22 FG · 40 XP · 106 pts
#18 Damian Ramos K LSU FBS 78 12 24 FG · 24 XP · 96 pts
#19 Jayden Fielding K Ohio State FBS 77 13 16 FG · 54 XP · 102 pts
#20 Eli Ozick K North Dakota State FCS 77 13 16 FG · 62 XP · 110 pts
#21 Ethan Sanchez K Houston FBS 77 12 20 FG · 38 XP · 98 pts
#22 Drew Stevens K Iowa FBS 76 12 20 FG · 37 XP · 97 pts
#23 Lorcan Quinn K Marshall FBS 76 12 21 FG · 38 XP · 101 pts
#24 Kali Nguma K North Texas FBS 76 13 12 FG · 70 XP · 106 pts
#25 Brad Larson K Tarleton State FCS 75 12 13 FG · 64 XP · 103 pts
#26 Mason Shipley K Texas FBS 75 12 18 FG · 43 XP · 97 pts
#27 Myles Sansted K Montana State FCS 75 14 17 FG · 64 XP · 115 pts
#28 Michael Petro K UTSA FBS 75 12 15 FG · 50 XP · 95 pts
#29 Reice Griffith K Mercer FCS 74 11 14 FG · 54 XP · 96 pts
#30 Randy Bond K Texas A&M FBS 74 9 11 FG · 36 XP · 69 pts
#31 Alex McPherson K Auburn FBS 74 12 20 FG · 35 XP · 95 pts
#32 Atticus Sappington K Oregon FBS 74 12 15 FG · 44 XP · 89 pts
#33 David Olano K Illinois FBS 73 12 17 FG · 41 XP · 92 pts
#34 Dillon Curtis K Utah FBS 73 12 10 FG · 63 XP · 93 pts
#35 Jesus Gomez K Arizona State FBS 73 12 21 FG · 29 XP · 92 pts
#36 Sean O'Haire K Maryland FBS 73 12 21 FG · 29 XP · 92 pts
#37 Kyle Konrardy K Iowa State FBS 72 8 14 FG · 19 XP · 61 pts
#38 Andrew Lastovka K Youngstown State FCS 72 13 15 FG · 57 XP · 102 pts
#39 Kyle Cunanan K Nebraska FBS 72 12 16 FG · 43 XP · 91 pts
#40 Brock Taylor K Vanderbilt FBS 72 12 11 FG · 57 XP · 90 pts
#41 Scott Starzyk K Arkansas FBS 72 12 14 FG · 47 XP · 89 pts
#42 Trajan Sinatra K Idaho State FCS 71 12 18 FG · 43 XP · 97 pts
#43 Nick Reed K New Hampshire FCS 71 13 25 FG · 30 XP · 105 pts
#44 Ryan Barker K Penn State FBS 71 12 15 FG · 43 XP · 88 pts
#45 Dominic Zvada K Michigan FBS 71 12 15 FG · 40 XP · 85 pts
#46 Peyton Woodring K Georgia FBS 71 13 15 FG · 50 XP · 95 pts
#47 Ramon Villela K UNLV FBS 70 13 14 FG · 57 XP · 99 pts
#48 Paul Geelen K Southern Illinois FCS 70 12 15 FG · 49 XP · 94 pts
#49 Dom Dzioban K Miami (OH) FBS 70 12 19 FG · 34 XP · 91 pts
#50 Morgan Suarez K James Madison FBS 70 13 12 FG · 63 XP · 99 pts

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Offensive line grades are team-inferred: college football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so those rows carry the team’s offensive rating and are flagged, not a measurement of the player. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.