Players 2019 final

1

Harrison Butker

KC· 16 G

34 FG made

2

Josh Lambo

JAX· 16 G

33 FG made

3

Wil Lutz

NO· 16 G

32 FG made

4

Zane Gonzalez

ARI· 16 G

31 FG made

5

Chris Boswell

PIT· 16 G

29 FG made

Kickers — 2019 · ranked by FG made

#	Player	Tm	G	Grade	FG/gm	Att/gm	FGM	FGA	FG%	50+	Long	PAT	Pts/gm
1	Harrison Butker	KC	16	76	2.12	2.38	34	38	89.5%	3	56	45/48	9.2
2	Josh Lambo	JAX	16	57	2.06	2.12	33	34	97.1%	4	56	19/20	7.4
3	Wil Lutz	NO	16	72	2.00	2.25	32	36	88.9%	3	58	48/49	9.0
4	Zane Gonzalez	ARI	16	64	1.94	2.19	31	35	88.6%	2	54	34/35	7.9
5	Chris Boswell	PIT	16	52	1.81	1.94	29	31	93.5%	1	51	28/28	7.2
6	Brandon McManus	DEN	16	52	1.81	2.12	29	34	85.3%	4	53	25/26	7.0
7	Justin Tucker	BAL	16	69	1.75	1.81	28	29	96.6%	1	51	57/59	8.8
8	Matt Gay	TB	16	64	1.69	2.19	27	35	77.1%	5	58	43/48	7.8
9	Dan Bailey	MIN	16	62	1.69	1.81	27	29	93.1%	3	50	40/44	7.6
10	Randy Bullock	CIN	16	46	1.69	1.94	27	31	87.1%	1	57	24/25	6.6
11	Matt Prater	DET	16	56	1.62	1.94	26	31	83.9%	7	56	35/36	7.1
12	Joey Slye	CAR	16	49	1.56	2.00	25	32	78.1%	8	55	31/35	6.6
13	Austin Seibert	CLE	16	46	1.56	1.81	25	29	86.2%	1	53	30/35	6.6
14	Dustin Hopkins	WAS	16	36	1.56	1.88	25	30	83.3%	2	53	21/22	6.0
15	Greg Zuerlein	LAR	16	54	1.50	2.06	24	33	72.7%	5	58	42/42	7.1
16	Jason Myers	SEA	16	48	1.44	1.75	23	28	82.1%	2	54	40/44	6.8
17	Jason Sanders	MIA	16	38	1.44	1.88	23	30	76.7%	3	54	29/30	6.1
18	Eddy Pineiro	CHI	16	36	1.44	1.75	23	28	82.1%	2	53	27/29	6.0
19	Younghoe Koo	ATL	8	83	2.88	3.25	23	26	88.5%	1	50	15/16	10.5
20	Robbie Gould	SF	13	67	1.77	2.38	23	31	74.2%	0	47	41/42	8.5
21	Steven Hauschka	BUF	16	33	1.38	1.75	22	28	78.6%	1	51	30/32	6.0
22	Mason Crosby	GB	16	47	1.38	1.50	22	24	91.7%	1	54	40/41	6.6
23	Jake Elliott	PHI	16	43	1.38	1.62	22	26	84.6%	2	53	35/37	6.3
24	Brett Maher	DAL	13	59	1.54	2.31	20	30	66.7%	4	63	36/36	7.4
25	Ka'imi Fairbairn	HOU	16	43	1.25	1.56	20	25	80.0%	3	54	40/45	6.2
26	Sam Ficken	NYJ	15	28	1.27	1.80	19	27	70.4%	3	54	23/26	5.3
27	Daniel Carlson	LV	16	31	1.19	1.62	19	26	73.1%	0	48	34/36	5.7
28	Chase McLaughlin	SF	11	55	1.64	2.09	18	23	78.3%	3	50	26/26	7.3
29	Adam Vinatieri	IND	12	40	1.42	2.08	17	25	68.0%	2	55	22/28	6.1
30	Nick Folk	NE	7	60	2.00	2.43	14	17	82.4%	1	51	12/12	7.7
31	Mike Badgley	LAC	8	51	1.62	2.00	13	16	81.2%	0	49	19/19	7.2
32	Aldrick Rosas	NYG	16	17	0.75	1.06	12	17	70.6%	0	45	35/39	4.4
33	Kai Forbath	NE	4	—	2.75	2.75	11	11	100.0%	1	50	11/12	11.0
34	Matt Bryant	ATL	7	41	1.29	2.00	9	14	64.3%	2	52	14/15	5.9
35	Stephen Gostkowski	NE	4	—	1.75	2.00	7	8	87.5%	0	41	11/15	8.0
36	Mike Nugent	NE	4	—	1.25	2.00	5	8	62.5%	0	37	15/16	7.5
37	Cairo Santos	TEN	5	—	0.80	1.80	4	9	44.4%	1	53	12/12	4.8
38	Ryan Succop	TEN	6	24	0.17	1.00	1	6	16.7%	0	31	24/25	4.5

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2019, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.