Players 2016 final
Quarterbacks — 2016 · ranked by Pass yards
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Yds/gm | Att/gm | Yds | TD | INT | Cmp% | Y/A | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
NO | 16 | 70 | 325.5 | 42.1 | 37 | 15 | 70.0% | 7.7 | 20 | |
| 2 |
|
ATL | 16 | 73 | 309.0 | 33.4 | 38 | 7 | 69.9% | 9.3 | 117 | |
| 3 |
|
WAS | 16 | 66 | 307.3 | 37.9 | 25 | 12 | 67.0% | 8.1 | 96 | |
| 4 |
|
GB | 16 | 83 | 276.8 | 38.1 | 40 | 7 | 65.7% | 7.3 | 369 | |
| 5 |
|
LAC | 16 | 55 | 274.1 | 36.1 | 33 | 21 | 60.4% | 7.6 | 35 | |
| 6 |
|
DET | 16 | 59 | 270.4 | 37.1 | 24 | 10 | 65.3% | 7.3 | 207 | |
| 7 |
|
BAL | 16 | 43 | 269.8 | 42.0 | 20 | 15 | 64.9% | 6.4 | 58 | |
| 8 |
|
IND | 15 | 68 | 282.7 | 36.3 | 31 | 13 | 63.5% | 7.8 | 341 | |
| 9 |
|
ARI | 15 | 53 | 282.2 | 39.8 | 26 | 14 | 61.0% | 7.1 | 38 | |
| 10 |
|
SEA | 16 | 56 | 263.7 | 34.1 | 21 | 11 | 64.7% | 7.7 | 259 | |
| 11 |
|
CIN | 16 | 57 | 262.9 | 35.2 | 18 | 8 | 64.7% | 7.5 | 184 | |
| 12 |
|
TB | 16 | 52 | 255.6 | 35.4 | 28 | 18 | 60.8% | 7.2 | 165 | |
| 13 |
|
NYG | 16 | 44 | 251.7 | 37.4 | 26 | 16 | 63.0% | 6.7 | -9 | |
| 14 |
|
LV | 15 | 63 | 262.5 | 37.3 | 28 | 6 | 63.7% | 7.0 | 70 | |
| 15 |
|
JAX | 16 | 46 | 244.1 | 39.1 | 23 | 16 | 58.9% | 6.2 | 359 | |
| 16 |
|
MIN | 15 | 51 | 258.5 | 36.8 | 20 | 5 | 71.6% | 7.0 | 53 | |
| 17 |
|
PIT | 14 | 62 | 272.8 | 36.4 | 29 | 13 | 64.4% | 7.5 | 14 | |
| 18 |
|
PHI | 16 | 42 | 236.4 | 37.9 | 16 | 14 | 62.4% | 6.2 | 150 | |
| 19 |
|
DAL | 16 | 65 | 229.2 | 28.7 | 23 | 4 | 67.8% | 8.0 | 282 | |
| 20 |
|
NE | 12 | 77 | 296.2 | 36.0 | 28 | 2 | 67.4% | 8.2 | 64 | |
| 21 |
|
CAR | 15 | 47 | 233.9 | 34.0 | 19 | 14 | 52.9% | 6.9 | 359 | |
| 22 |
|
KC | 15 | 49 | 233.5 | 32.6 | 15 | 8 | 67.1% | 7.2 | 134 | |
| 23 |
|
TEN | 15 | 60 | 228.4 | 30.1 | 26 | 9 | 61.2% | 7.6 | 349 | |
| 24 |
|
DEN | 14 | 45 | 242.9 | 34.7 | 18 | 10 | 59.5% | 7.0 | 57 | |
| 25 |
|
BUF | 15 | 58 | 201.5 | 29.1 | 17 | 6 | 61.7% | 6.9 | 580 | |
| 26 |
|
MIA | 13 | 48 | 230.4 | 29.9 | 19 | 12 | 67.1% | 7.7 | 164 | |
| 27 |
|
HOU | 15 | 32 | 197.1 | 34.0 | 15 | 16 | 59.0% | 5.8 | 131 | |
| 28 |
|
NYJ | 14 | 34 | 193.6 | 28.8 | 12 | 17 | 56.6% | 6.7 | 130 | |
| 29 |
|
SF | 11 | 54 | 203.7 | 30.1 | 16 | 4 | 59.2% | 6.8 | 468 | |
| 30 |
|
LAR | 10 | 35 | 220.1 | 32.2 | 9 | 11 | 60.9% | 6.8 | 51 | |
| 31 |
|
CHI | 7 | 37 | 230.1 | 30.9 | 8 | 14 | 59.7% | 7.5 | 2 | |
| 32 |
|
CHI | 6 | 50 | 240.8 | 33.3 | 6 | 0 | 67.0% | 7.2 | -2 | |
| 33 |
|
CLE | 9 | 38 | 153.3 | 21.7 | 6 | 2 | 65.6% | 7.1 | 18 | |
| 34 |
|
CLE | 5 | — | 220.0 | 33.0 | 6 | 6 | 54.5% | 6.7 | 21 | |
| 35 |
|
LAR | 7 | 23 | 155.6 | 29.3 | 5 | 7 | 54.6% | 5.3 | 16 | |
| 36 |
|
CHI | 5 | — | 211.8 | 27.4 | 4 | 5 | 59.1% | 7.7 | 24 | |
| 37 |
|
SF | 6 | 40 | 154.2 | 26.7 | 5 | 6 | 56.9% | 5.8 | 173 | |
| 38 |
|
CLE | 5 | — | 177.2 | 29.4 | 2 | 3 | 59.2% | 6.0 | 190 | |
| 39 |
|
NYJ | 6 | 27 | 134.8 | 22.2 | 3 | 7 | 56.4% | 6.1 | 19 | |
| 40 |
|
MIA | 4 | — | 180.2 | 21.8 | 8 | 3 | 63.2% | 8.3 | -1 | |
| 41 |
|
PIT | 7 | 30 | 79.7 | 12.3 | 4 | 2 | 61.6% | 6.5 | -4 | |
| 42 |
|
NE | 6 | 41 | 83.7 | 10.5 | 4 | 0 | 68.3% | 8.0 | 6 | |
| 43 |
|
CAR | 4 | — | 113.2 | 13.2 | 2 | 5 | 67.9% | 8.5 | 4 | |
| 44 |
|
TEN | 4 | — | 71.0 | 12.8 | 2 | 2 | 58.8% | 5.6 | 3 | |
| 45 |
|
ARI | 5 | — | 38.4 | 9.6 | 2 | 3 | 39.6% | 4.0 | -3 | |
| 46 |
|
SEA | 4 | — | 36.2 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 72.2% | 8.1 | 1 | |
| 47 |
|
BUF | 5 | — | 26.2 | 5.2 | 0 | 0 | 42.3% | 5.0 | 22 | |
| 48 |
|
BAL | 4 | — | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% | 4.3 | -6 | |
| 49 |
|
GB | 4 | — | 4.2 | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | 20.0% | 1.7 | -2 | |
| 50 |
|
CAR | 9 | 17 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2016, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.