BallKnowMe
More
NFL
1–1 · 50% · every call graded in public record →

Players 2019 final

Quarterbacks — 2019 · ranked by Pass yards

#PlayerTmG Grade Yds/gm Att/gm Yds TD INT Cmp% Y/A Rush yds
1 Jameis Winston TB 16 57 319.3 39.1 5109 33 30 60.7% 8.2 250
2 Dak Prescott DAL 16 73 306.4 37.2 4902 30 11 65.1% 8.2 277
3 Jared Goff LAR 16 50 289.9 39.1 4638 22 16 62.9% 7.4 40
4 Philip Rivers LAC 16 49 288.4 36.9 4615 23 20 66.0% 7.8 29
5 Matt Ryan ATL 15 56 297.7 41.1 4466 26 14 66.2% 7.2 147
6 Russell Wilson SEA 16 70 256.9 32.2 4110 31 5 66.1% 8.0 342
7 Tom Brady NE 16 52 253.6 38.3 4057 24 8 60.8% 6.6 34
8 Derek Carr LV 16 58 253.4 32.1 4054 21 8 70.4% 7.9 82
9 Carson Wentz PHI 16 60 252.4 37.9 4039 27 7 63.9% 6.7 243
10 Patrick Mahomes KC 14 76 287.9 34.6 4031 26 5 65.9% 8.3 218
11 Aaron Rodgers GB 16 61 250.1 35.6 4002 26 4 62.0% 7.0 183
12 Jimmy Garoppolo SF 16 53 248.6 29.8 3978 27 13 69.1% 8.4 62
13 Deshaun Watson HOU 15 64 256.8 33.0 3852 26 12 67.3% 7.8 413
14 Baker Mayfield CLE 16 43 239.2 33.4 3827 22 21 59.4% 7.2 141
15 Kyler Murray ARI 16 55 232.6 33.9 3722 20 12 64.4% 6.9 544
16 Kirk Cousins MIN 15 59 240.2 29.6 3603 26 6 69.1% 8.1 63
17 Ryan Fitzpatrick MIA 15 51 235.3 33.5 3529 20 13 62.0% 7.0 243
18 Andy Dalton CIN 13 45 268.8 40.6 3494 16 14 59.5% 6.6 73
19 Kyle Allen CAR 13 39 255.5 37.6 3322 17 16 62.0% 6.8 106
20 Gardner Minshew JAX 14 48 233.6 33.6 3271 21 6 60.6% 7.0 344
21 Mitchell Trubisky CHI 15 37 209.2 34.4 3138 17 10 63.2% 6.1 193
22 Lamar Jackson BAL 15 83 208.5 26.7 3127 36 6 66.1% 7.8 1206
23 Josh Allen BUF 16 50 193.1 28.8 3089 20 9 58.8% 6.7 510
24 Daniel Jones NYG 13 47 232.8 35.3 3027 24 12 61.9% 6.6 279
25 Sam Darnold NYJ 13 42 232.6 33.9 3024 19 13 61.9% 6.9 62
26 Drew Brees NO 11 68 270.8 34.4 2979 27 4 74.3% 7.9 -4
27 Jacoby Brissett IND 15 44 196.1 29.8 2942 18 6 60.9% 6.6 228
28 Ryan Tannehill TEN 12 63 228.5 23.8 2742 22 6 70.3% 9.6 185
29 Matthew Stafford DET 8 66 312.4 36.4 2499 19 5 64.3% 8.6 66
30 Joe Flacco DEN 8 34 227.8 32.8 1822 6 5 65.3% 7.0 20
31 Mason Rudolph PIT 10 32 176.5 28.3 1765 13 9 62.2% 6.2 42
32 Case Keenum WAS 10 36 170.7 24.7 1707 11 5 64.8% 6.9 12
33 Teddy Bridgewater NO 9 40 153.8 21.8 1384 9 2 67.9% 7.1 31
34 Dwayne Haskins WAS 9 27 151.7 22.6 1365 7 7 58.6% 6.7 101
35 Marcus Mariota TEN 7 41 171.9 22.9 1203 7 2 59.4% 7.5 129
36 Devlin Hodges PIT 8 24 132.9 20.0 1063 5 8 62.5% 6.6 68
37 Eli Manning NYG 4 260.5 36.8 1042 6 5 61.9% 7.1 7
38 Drew Lock DEN 5 204.0 31.2 1020 7 3 64.1% 6.5 72
39 David Blough DET 5 196.8 34.8 984 4 6 54.0% 5.7 31
40 Nick Foles JAX 4 184.0 29.2 736 3 2 65.8% 6.3 23
41 Matt Moore KC 6 30 109.8 15.2 659 4 0 64.8% 7.2 -1
42 Matt Schaub ATL 5 116.0 13.4 580 3 1 74.6% 8.7 -3
43 Josh Rosen MIA 5 113.4 21.8 567 1 5 53.2% 5.2 13
44 Brian Hoyer IND 4 93.0 16.2 372 4 4 53.8% 5.7 2
45 Robert Griffin III BAL 6 17 37.5 6.3 225 1 2 60.5% 5.9 70
46 Tyrod Taylor LAC 4 8.2 1.5 33 1 0 66.7% 5.5 7
47 Garrett Gilbert CLE 5 0.0 0.6 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0 -3

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2019, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.