Players 2019 final
Quarterbacks — 2019 · ranked by Pass yards
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Yds/gm | Att/gm | Yds | TD | INT | Cmp% | Y/A | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
TB | 16 | 57 | 319.3 | 39.1 | 33 | 30 | 60.7% | 8.2 | 250 | |
| 2 |
|
DAL | 16 | 73 | 306.4 | 37.2 | 30 | 11 | 65.1% | 8.2 | 277 | |
| 3 |
|
LAR | 16 | 50 | 289.9 | 39.1 | 22 | 16 | 62.9% | 7.4 | 40 | |
| 4 |
|
LAC | 16 | 49 | 288.4 | 36.9 | 23 | 20 | 66.0% | 7.8 | 29 | |
| 5 |
|
ATL | 15 | 56 | 297.7 | 41.1 | 26 | 14 | 66.2% | 7.2 | 147 | |
| 6 |
|
SEA | 16 | 70 | 256.9 | 32.2 | 31 | 5 | 66.1% | 8.0 | 342 | |
| 7 |
|
NE | 16 | 52 | 253.6 | 38.3 | 24 | 8 | 60.8% | 6.6 | 34 | |
| 8 |
|
LV | 16 | 58 | 253.4 | 32.1 | 21 | 8 | 70.4% | 7.9 | 82 | |
| 9 |
|
PHI | 16 | 60 | 252.4 | 37.9 | 27 | 7 | 63.9% | 6.7 | 243 | |
| 10 |
|
KC | 14 | 76 | 287.9 | 34.6 | 26 | 5 | 65.9% | 8.3 | 218 | |
| 11 |
|
GB | 16 | 61 | 250.1 | 35.6 | 26 | 4 | 62.0% | 7.0 | 183 | |
| 12 |
|
SF | 16 | 53 | 248.6 | 29.8 | 27 | 13 | 69.1% | 8.4 | 62 | |
| 13 |
|
HOU | 15 | 64 | 256.8 | 33.0 | 26 | 12 | 67.3% | 7.8 | 413 | |
| 14 |
|
CLE | 16 | 43 | 239.2 | 33.4 | 22 | 21 | 59.4% | 7.2 | 141 | |
| 15 |
|
ARI | 16 | 55 | 232.6 | 33.9 | 20 | 12 | 64.4% | 6.9 | 544 | |
| 16 |
|
MIN | 15 | 59 | 240.2 | 29.6 | 26 | 6 | 69.1% | 8.1 | 63 | |
| 17 |
|
MIA | 15 | 51 | 235.3 | 33.5 | 20 | 13 | 62.0% | 7.0 | 243 | |
| 18 |
|
CIN | 13 | 45 | 268.8 | 40.6 | 16 | 14 | 59.5% | 6.6 | 73 | |
| 19 |
|
CAR | 13 | 39 | 255.5 | 37.6 | 17 | 16 | 62.0% | 6.8 | 106 | |
| 20 |
|
JAX | 14 | 48 | 233.6 | 33.6 | 21 | 6 | 60.6% | 7.0 | 344 | |
| 21 |
|
CHI | 15 | 37 | 209.2 | 34.4 | 17 | 10 | 63.2% | 6.1 | 193 | |
| 22 |
|
BAL | 15 | 83 | 208.5 | 26.7 | 36 | 6 | 66.1% | 7.8 | 1206 | |
| 23 |
|
BUF | 16 | 50 | 193.1 | 28.8 | 20 | 9 | 58.8% | 6.7 | 510 | |
| 24 |
|
NYG | 13 | 47 | 232.8 | 35.3 | 24 | 12 | 61.9% | 6.6 | 279 | |
| 25 |
|
NYJ | 13 | 42 | 232.6 | 33.9 | 19 | 13 | 61.9% | 6.9 | 62 | |
| 26 |
|
NO | 11 | 68 | 270.8 | 34.4 | 27 | 4 | 74.3% | 7.9 | -4 | |
| 27 |
|
IND | 15 | 44 | 196.1 | 29.8 | 18 | 6 | 60.9% | 6.6 | 228 | |
| 28 |
|
TEN | 12 | 63 | 228.5 | 23.8 | 22 | 6 | 70.3% | 9.6 | 185 | |
| 29 |
|
DET | 8 | 66 | 312.4 | 36.4 | 19 | 5 | 64.3% | 8.6 | 66 | |
| 30 |
|
DEN | 8 | 34 | 227.8 | 32.8 | 6 | 5 | 65.3% | 7.0 | 20 | |
| 31 |
|
PIT | 10 | 32 | 176.5 | 28.3 | 13 | 9 | 62.2% | 6.2 | 42 | |
| 32 |
|
WAS | 10 | 36 | 170.7 | 24.7 | 11 | 5 | 64.8% | 6.9 | 12 | |
| 33 |
|
NO | 9 | 40 | 153.8 | 21.8 | 9 | 2 | 67.9% | 7.1 | 31 | |
| 34 |
|
WAS | 9 | 27 | 151.7 | 22.6 | 7 | 7 | 58.6% | 6.7 | 101 | |
| 35 |
|
TEN | 7 | 41 | 171.9 | 22.9 | 7 | 2 | 59.4% | 7.5 | 129 | |
| 36 |
|
PIT | 8 | 24 | 132.9 | 20.0 | 5 | 8 | 62.5% | 6.6 | 68 | |
| 37 |
|
NYG | 4 | — | 260.5 | 36.8 | 6 | 5 | 61.9% | 7.1 | 7 | |
| 38 |
|
DEN | 5 | — | 204.0 | 31.2 | 7 | 3 | 64.1% | 6.5 | 72 | |
| 39 |
|
DET | 5 | — | 196.8 | 34.8 | 4 | 6 | 54.0% | 5.7 | 31 | |
| 40 |
|
JAX | 4 | — | 184.0 | 29.2 | 3 | 2 | 65.8% | 6.3 | 23 | |
| 41 |
|
KC | 6 | 30 | 109.8 | 15.2 | 4 | 0 | 64.8% | 7.2 | -1 | |
| 42 |
|
ATL | 5 | — | 116.0 | 13.4 | 3 | 1 | 74.6% | 8.7 | -3 | |
| 43 |
|
MIA | 5 | — | 113.4 | 21.8 | 1 | 5 | 53.2% | 5.2 | 13 | |
| 44 |
|
IND | 4 | — | 93.0 | 16.2 | 4 | 4 | 53.8% | 5.7 | 2 | |
| 45 |
|
BAL | 6 | 17 | 37.5 | 6.3 | 1 | 2 | 60.5% | 5.9 | 70 | |
| 46 |
|
LAC | 4 | — | 8.2 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% | 5.5 | 7 | |
| 47 |
|
CLE | 5 | — | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0 | -3 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2019, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.