Players 2018 final postseason

1

Julian Edelman

NE· 3 G

388 Rec yards

2

Brandin Cooks

LAR· 3 G

292 Rec yards

3

Michael Thomas

NO· 2 G

207 Rec yards

4

Sammy Watkins

KC· 2 G

176 Rec yards

5

Robert Woods

LAR· 3 G

172 Rec yards

Wide receivers — 2018 · ranked by Rec yards

#	Player	Tm	G	Yds/gm	Rec/gm	Tgt/gm	Rec yds	Rec	TD	Y/R	Catch%	Tgt share	WOPR
1	Julian Edelman	NE	3	129.3	8.7	11.7	388	26	0	14.9	74.3%	28.5%	0.72
2	Brandin Cooks	LAR	3	97.3	6.3	9.0	292	19	0	15.4	70.4%	26.3%	0.66
3	Michael Thomas	NO	2	103.5	8.0	11.5	207	16	1	12.9	69.6%	30.6%	0.68
4	Sammy Watkins	KC	2	88.0	5.0	8.0	176	10	0	17.6	62.5%	23.5%	0.51
5	Robert Woods	LAR	3	57.3	5.7	9.7	172	17	0	10.1	58.6%	28.5%	0.58
6	Amari Cooper	DAL	2	85.5	6.5	9.0	171	13	1	13.2	72.2%	28.1%	0.63
7	Alshon Jeffery	PHI	2	72.5	5.5	8.5	145	11	0	13.2	64.7%	24.2%	0.58
8	T.Y. Hilton	IND	2	72.5	4.5	10.5	145	9	1	16.1	42.9%	31.4%	0.72
9	Allen Robinson	CHI	1	143.0	10.0	13.0	143	10	1	14.3	76.9%	31.7%	0.75
10	Michael Gallup	DAL	2	68.5	4.0	7.5	137	8	1	17.1	53.3%	23.4%	0.64
11	Josh Reynolds	LAR	3	40.3	2.7	6.0	121	8	0	15.1	44.4%	17.4%	0.42
12	Tyler Lockett	SEA	1	120.0	4.0	6.0	120	4	0	30.0	66.7%	22.2%	0.72
13	Tyreek Hill	KC	2	57.0	4.5	8.0	114	9	0	12.7	56.2%	21.0%	0.58
14	Keenan Allen	LAC	2	56.0	3.0	6.0	112	6	1	18.7	50.0%	16.7%	0.42
15	Mike Williams	LAC	2	55.0	3.5	8.0	110	7	0	15.7	43.8%	20.3%	0.55
16	Keke Coutee	HOU	1	110.0	11.0	14.0	110	11	1	10.0	78.6%	29.8%	0.57
17	Dontrelle Inman	IND	2	54.0	4.0	4.0	108	8	1	13.5	100.0%	12.0%	0.28
18	Tyrell Williams	LAC	2	51.5	3.5	5.5	103	7	0	14.7	63.6%	14.3%	0.37
19	Ted Ginn	NO	2	51.0	3.0	6.5	102	6	0	17.0	46.2%	17.2%	0.49
20	Chester Rogers	IND	2	38.0	4.5	5.5	76	9	0	8.4	81.8%	16.4%	0.32
21	Phillip Dorsett	NE	2	35.0	2.5	4.0	70	5	2	14.0	62.5%	8.9%	0.33
22	Golden Tate	PHI	2	32.0	3.5	6.5	64	7	1	9.1	53.8%	18.1%	0.43
23	Chris Hogan	NE	3	19.3	2.7	6.0	58	8	0	7.2	44.4%	14.6%	0.39
24	Willie Snead	BAL	1	50.0	3.0	6.0	50	3	0	16.7	50.0%	23.1%	0.52
25	Cole Beasley	DAL	2	21.5	2.0	2.5	43	4	0	10.8	80.0%	7.8%	0.17
26	Michael Crabtree	BAL	1	38.0	2.0	4.0	38	2	2	19.0	50.0%	15.4%	0.45
27	Nelson Agholor	PHI	2	19.0	2.0	4.5	38	4	0	9.5	44.4%	12.3%	0.29
28	Taylor Gabriel	CHI	1	37.0	4.0	9.0	37	4	0	9.2	44.4%	22.0%	0.47
29	DeAndre Hopkins	HOU	1	37.0	5.0	10.0	37	5	0	7.4	50.0%	21.3%	0.55
30	Josh Bellamy	CHI	1	34.0	1.0	1.0	34	1	0	34.0	100.0%	2.4%	0.09
31	Anthony Miller	CHI	1	34.0	3.0	5.0	34	3	0	11.3	60.0%	12.2%	0.30
32	Doug Baldwin	SEA	1	32.0	3.0	6.0	32	3	0	10.7	50.0%	22.2%	0.56
33	Demarcus Robinson	KC	1	27.0	1.0	1.0	27	1	0	27.0	100.0%	3.4%	0.10
34	Tre'Quan Smith	NO	2	12.5	1.0	2.0	25	2	0	12.5	50.0%	5.2%	0.15
35	Noah Brown	DAL	2	9.5	1.0	2.5	19	2	0	9.5	40.0%	7.8%	0.17
36	Allen Hurns	DAL	1	14.0	1.0	1.0	14	1	0	14.0	100.0%	3.1%	0.07
37	John Brown	BAL	1	14.0	2.0	3.0	14	2	0	7.0	66.7%	11.5%	0.23
38	Zach Pascal	IND	2	6.5	1.0	3.0	13	2	0	6.5	33.3%	9.0%	0.22
39	Gehrig Dieter	KC	2	5.5	0.5	0.5	11	1	0	11.0	100.0%	1.2%	0.02
40	Travis Benjamin	LAC	2	5.5	1.5	2.5	11	3	0	3.7	60.0%	7.3%	0.11
41	Keith Kirkwood	NO	1	8.0	2.0	2.0	8	2	1	4.0	100.0%	5.4%	0.10
42	Austin Carr	NO	1	5.0	1.0	1.0	5	1	0	5.0	100.0%	2.6%	0.05
43	Tavon Austin	DAL	2	2.5	1.0	1.0	5	2	0	2.5	100.0%	3.1%	0.05
44	Matthew Slater	NE	2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0.0%	0.00
45	DeAndre Carter	HOU	1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0.0%	0.00
46	Geremy Davis	LAC	2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0.0%	0.00
47	Chris Conley	KC	2	0.0	0.0	1.5	0	0	0	—	0.0%	4.2%	0.08
48	Tommylee Lewis	NO	2	0.0	0.0	0.5	0	0	0	—	0.0%	1.3%	0.03
49	Chris Moore	BAL	1	0.0	0.0	1.0	0	0	0	—	0.0%	3.8%	0.10
50	Ty Montgomery	BAL	1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0.0%	0.00
51	JoJo Natson	LAR	3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0.0%	0.00
52	KhaDarel Hodge	LAR	1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0.0%	0.00
53	Vyncint Smith	HOU	1	0.0	0.0	2.0	0	0	0	—	0.0%	4.3%	0.21

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2018, ranked by Rec yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 1 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.