Players 2016 final

1

T.Y. Hilton

IND· 16 G

1448 Rec yards

2

Julio Jones

ATL· 14 G

1409 Rec yards

3

Odell Beckham Jr.

NYG· 16 G

1367 Rec yards

4

Mike Evans

TB· 16 G

1321 Rec yards

5

Antonio Brown

PIT· 15 G

1284 Rec yards

Wide receivers — 2016 · ranked by Rec yards

#	Player	Tm	G	Grade	Yds/gm	Rec/gm	Tgt/gm	Rec yds	Rec	TD	Y/R	Catch%	Tgt share	WOPR
1	T.Y. Hilton	IND	16	78	90.5	5.7	9.7	1448	91	6	15.9	58.7%	27.2%	0.69
2	Julio Jones	ATL	14	79	100.6	5.9	9.2	1409	83	6	17.0	64.3%	27.1%	0.70
3	Odell Beckham Jr.	NYG	16	81	85.4	6.3	10.6	1367	101	10	13.5	59.8%	28.6%	0.70
4	Mike Evans	TB	16	83	82.6	6.0	10.8	1321	96	12	13.8	55.5%	30.4%	0.76
5	Antonio Brown	PIT	15	91	85.6	7.1	10.3	1284	106	12	12.1	68.8%	27.7%	0.66
6	Jordy Nelson	GB	16	85	78.6	6.1	9.5	1257	97	14	13.0	63.8%	25.6%	0.62
7	Brandin Cooks	NO	15	75	78.2	5.2	7.8	1173	78	8	15.0	66.7%	18.8%	0.51
8	Amari Cooper	LV	16	70	72.1	5.2	8.2	1153	83	5	13.9	62.9%	22.2%	0.52
9	Michael Thomas	NO	15	75	75.8	6.1	8.1	1137	92	9	12.4	76.0%	19.6%	0.45
10	Jarvis Landry	MIA	16	70	71.0	5.9	8.2	1136	94	4	12.1	71.8%	27.6%	0.57
11	Doug Baldwin	SEA	16	74	70.5	5.9	7.8	1128	94	7	12.0	75.2%	22.5%	0.49
12	Julian Edelman	NE	16	72	69.1	6.1	9.9	1106	98	3	11.3	61.6%	29.3%	0.67
13	Demaryius Thomas	DEN	16	69	67.7	5.6	9.0	1083	90	5	12.0	62.5%	26.3%	0.61
14	Golden Tate	DET	16	69	67.3	5.7	8.4	1077	91	4	11.8	67.4%	23.7%	0.53
15	Tyrell Williams	LAC	16	67	66.2	4.3	7.4	1059	69	7	15.3	58.0%	21.4%	0.51
16	Pierre Garcon	WAS	16	65	65.1	4.9	7.1	1041	79	3	13.2	69.3%	20.3%	0.46
17	Emmanuel Sanders	DEN	15	67	68.8	5.3	9.1	1032	79	5	13.1	57.7%	27.0%	0.66
18	Larry Fitzgerald	ARI	16	72	63.9	6.7	9.4	1023	107	6	9.6	71.3%	23.5%	0.49
19	Mike Wallace	BAL	16	64	63.6	4.5	7.2	1017	72	4	14.1	62.1%	17.6%	0.45
20	Terrelle Pryor	CLE	16	63	62.9	4.8	8.8	1007	77	4	13.1	55.0%	24.7%	0.65
21	DeSean Jackson	WAS	15	61	67.0	3.7	6.7	1005	56	4	17.9	56.0%	18.2%	0.48
22	Michael Crabtree	LV	16	71	62.7	5.6	9.1	1003	89	8	11.3	61.4%	24.7%	0.61
23	Kenny Britt	LAR	15	66	66.8	4.5	7.4	1002	68	5	14.7	61.3%	22.6%	0.58
24	Davante Adams	GB	16	73	62.3	4.7	7.6	997	75	12	13.3	62.0%	19.6%	0.48
25	Adam Thielen	MIN	16	63	60.4	4.3	5.8	967	69	5	14.0	75.0%	15.6%	0.41
26	A.J. Green	CIN	10	76	96.4	6.6	10.0	964	66	4	14.6	66.0%	30.4%	0.74
27	DeAndre Hopkins	HOU	16	65	59.6	4.9	9.4	954	78	4	12.2	51.7%	26.2%	0.64
28	Rishard Matthews	TEN	16	68	59.1	4.1	6.8	945	65	9	14.5	60.2%	22.2%	0.55
29	Kelvin Benjamin	CAR	16	64	58.8	3.9	7.4	941	63	7	14.9	53.4%	21.4%	0.50
30	Marvin Jones	DET	15	60	62.0	3.7	6.9	930	55	4	16.9	53.4%	19.0%	0.53
31	Stefon Diggs	MIN	13	68	69.5	6.5	8.6	903	84	3	10.8	75.0%	23.7%	0.56
32	Willie Snead	NO	15	65	59.7	4.8	6.9	895	72	4	12.4	69.2%	17.2%	0.37
33	Cameron Meredith	CHI	14	63	63.4	4.7	6.9	888	66	4	13.5	68.0%	19.2%	0.44
34	Allen Robinson	JAX	16	64	55.2	4.6	9.4	883	73	6	12.1	48.3%	24.2%	0.63
35	Brandon LaFell	CIN	16	62	53.9	4.0	6.7	862	64	6	13.5	59.8%	20.5%	0.50
36	Quincy Enunwa	NYJ	16	59	53.6	3.6	6.6	857	58	4	14.8	55.2%	19.2%	0.42
37	Marqise Lee	JAX	16	59	53.2	3.9	6.6	851	63	3	13.5	60.0%	17.3%	0.43
38	Jamison Crowder	WAS	16	62	52.9	4.2	6.2	847	67	7	12.6	67.7%	16.3%	0.35
39	Cole Beasley	DAL	16	61	52.1	4.7	6.1	833	75	5	11.1	76.5%	20.7%	0.42
40	Alshon Jeffery	CHI	12	62	68.4	4.3	7.8	821	52	2	15.8	55.3%	23.0%	0.59
41	Dontrelle Inman	LAC	16	58	50.6	3.6	6.1	810	58	4	14.0	59.8%	17.0%	0.41
42	Steve Smith	BAL	14	66	57.1	5.0	7.2	799	70	5	11.4	69.3%	18.3%	0.42
43	Dez Bryant	DAL	13	67	61.2	3.8	7.4	796	50	8	15.9	52.1%	24.6%	0.66
44	Brandon Marshall	NYJ	15	58	52.5	3.9	8.5	788	59	3	13.4	46.1%	24.9%	0.62
45	Ted Ginn	CAR	16	57	47.0	3.4	5.9	752	54	4	13.9	56.8%	17.4%	0.40
46	DeVante Parker	MIA	15	58	49.6	3.7	5.8	744	56	4	13.3	64.4%	19.5%	0.49
47	Kenny Stills	MIA	16	60	45.4	2.6	5.1	726	42	9	17.3	51.9%	17.4%	0.48
48	Sterling Shepard	NYG	16	61	42.7	4.1	6.6	683	65	8	10.5	61.9%	17.3%	0.40
49	Chris Hogan	NE	15	55	45.3	2.5	3.9	680	38	4	17.9	65.5%	11.5%	0.31
50	Travis Benjamin	LAC	14	57	48.4	3.4	5.4	677	47	4	14.4	62.7%	15.8%	0.39
51	Jeremy Kerley	SF	16	56	41.7	4.0	7.2	667	64	3	10.4	55.7%	24.4%	0.55
52	Mohamed Sanu	ATL	15	57	43.5	3.9	5.4	653	59	4	11.1	72.8%	16.0%	0.34
53	Will Fuller	HOU	14	54	45.4	3.4	6.6	635	47	2	13.5	51.1%	18.2%	0.49
54	Adam Humphries	TB	15	54	41.5	3.7	5.5	622	55	2	11.3	66.3%	14.6%	0.27
55	Robert Woods	BUF	13	56	47.2	3.9	5.8	613	51	1	12.0	67.1%	19.9%	0.46
56	Randall Cobb	GB	13	60	46.9	4.6	6.5	610	60	4	10.2	71.4%	16.1%	0.33
57	Tyler Boyd	CIN	16	52	37.7	3.4	5.1	603	54	1	11.2	66.7%	14.8%	0.33
58	Tyler Lockett	SEA	15	52	39.8	2.7	4.4	597	41	1	14.6	62.1%	13.1%	0.30
59	Terrance Williams	DAL	15	53	39.6	2.9	4.1	594	44	4	13.5	72.1%	14.0%	0.37
60	Eli Rogers	PIT	13	56	45.7	3.7	5.1	594	48	3	12.4	72.7%	13.8%	0.31

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2016, ranked by Rec yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.