Players 2018 final
Running backs — 2018 · ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Scrim/gm | Rush/gm | Car/gm | Rec/gm | Rush yds | YPC | Rush TD | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
DAL | 15 | 78 | 95.6 | 20.3 | 5.1 | 1434 | 4.7 | 6 | 567 | 3 | |
| 2 |
|
LAR | 14 | 89 | 89.4 | 18.3 | 4.2 | 1251 | 4.9 | 17 | 580 | 4 | |
| 3 |
|
NYG | 16 | 83 | 81.7 | 16.3 | 5.7 | 1307 | 5.0 | 11 | 721 | 4 | |
| 4 |
|
CAR | 16 | 80 | 68.6 | 13.7 | 6.7 | 1098 | 5.0 | 7 | 867 | 6 | |
| 5 |
|
LAC | 12 | 74 | 73.8 | 14.6 | 4.2 | 885 | 5.1 | 10 | 490 | 4 | |
| 6 |
|
PIT | 13 | 73 | 74.8 | 16.5 | 4.2 | 973 | 4.5 | 12 | 497 | 1 | |
| 7 |
|
KC | 11 | 72 | 74.9 | 16.5 | 2.4 | 824 | 4.6 | 7 | 378 | 7 | |
| 8 |
|
NO | 15 | 76 | 58.9 | 12.9 | 5.4 | 883 | 4.6 | 14 | 709 | 4 | |
| 9 |
|
CIN | 14 | 71 | 83.4 | 16.9 | 3.1 | 1168 | 4.9 | 8 | 296 | 1 | |
| 10 |
|
SEA | 14 | 68 | 82.2 | 17.6 | 1.4 | 1151 | 4.7 | 9 | 163 | 0 | |
| 11 |
|
ARI | 16 | 69 | 58.8 | 16.1 | 3.1 | 940 | 3.6 | 7 | 446 | 3 | |
| 12 |
|
DET | 10 | 65 | 64.1 | 11.8 | 3.2 | 641 | 5.4 | 3 | 213 | 1 | |
| 13 |
|
DEN | 15 | 67 | 69.1 | 12.8 | 2.3 | 1037 | 5.4 | 9 | 241 | 1 | |
| 14 |
|
IND | 12 | 69 | 75.7 | 16.2 | 1.4 | 908 | 4.7 | 9 | 103 | 1 | |
| 15 |
|
MIN | 11 | 62 | 55.9 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 615 | 4.6 | 2 | 305 | 2 | |
| 16 |
|
HOU | 14 | 61 | 69.5 | 15.0 | 1.8 | 973 | 4.6 | 5 | 163 | 1 | |
| 17 |
|
WAS | 16 | 64 | 65.1 | 15.7 | 1.2 | 1042 | 4.2 | 7 | 208 | 1 | |
| 18 |
|
JAX | 8 | 66 | 54.9 | 16.6 | 2.8 | 439 | 3.3 | 5 | 185 | 1 | |
| 19 |
|
GB | 12 | 65 | 60.7 | 11.1 | 2.2 | 728 | 5.5 | 8 | 206 | 1 | |
| 20 |
|
SF | 14 | 59 | 58.1 | 10.9 | 1.9 | 814 | 5.3 | 3 | 261 | 2 | |
| 21 |
|
LV | 6 | 58 | 62.7 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 376 | 4.2 | 3 | 84 | 0 | |
| 22 |
|
NE | 13 | 58 | 71.6 | 16.1 | 0.5 | 931 | 4.5 | 6 | 50 | 0 | |
| 23 |
|
NE | 16 | 70 | 26.6 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 425 | 4.5 | 5 | 751 | 7 | |
| 24 |
|
CHI | 16 | 64 | 27.8 | 6.2 | 4.4 | 444 | 4.5 | 3 | 725 | 5 | |
| 25 |
|
TEN | 16 | 66 | 66.2 | 13.4 | 0.9 | 1059 | 4.9 | 12 | 99 | 0 | |
| 26 |
|
CLE | 16 | 61 | 62.2 | 12.0 | 1.2 | 996 | 5.2 | 8 | 149 | 2 | |
| 27 |
|
LAC | 14 | 58 | 39.6 | 7.6 | 2.8 | 554 | 5.2 | 3 | 404 | 3 | |
| 28 |
|
NO | 12 | 61 | 53.8 | 11.5 | 1.8 | 645 | 4.7 | 6 | 170 | 1 | |
| 29 |
|
CHI | 16 | 59 | 58.4 | 15.6 | 1.2 | 935 | 3.7 | 9 | 145 | 0 | |
| 30 |
|
ATL | 16 | 62 | 50.0 | 10.4 | 2.0 | 800 | 4.8 | 4 | 276 | 5 | |
| 31 |
|
BAL | 11 | 51 | 65.3 | 12.5 | 0.2 | 718 | 5.2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | |
| 32 |
|
NYJ | 7 | 54 | 49.0 | 11.4 | 1.6 | 343 | 4.3 | 0 | 110 | 1 | |
| 33 |
|
NYJ | 13 | 57 | 52.7 | 11.0 | 1.6 | 685 | 4.8 | 6 | 152 | 0 | |
| 34 |
|
JAX | 14 | 60 | 29.6 | 7.4 | 3.9 | 414 | 4.0 | 1 | 487 | 4 | |
| 35 |
|
BAL | 6 | 55 | 55.5 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 333 | 5.5 | 2 | 51 | 0 | |
| 36 |
|
MIA | 16 | 63 | 33.4 | 7.5 | 3.3 | 535 | 4.5 | 4 | 477 | 5 | |
| 37 |
|
SF | 6 | 52 | 44.3 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 266 | 4.0 | 0 | 98 | 0 | |
| 38 |
|
MIA | 14 | 50 | 51.6 | 11.1 | 0.9 | 722 | 4.6 | 0 | 124 | 1 | |
| 39 |
|
TB | 16 | 56 | 54.4 | 14.6 | 1.2 | 871 | 3.7 | 5 | 92 | 1 | |
| 40 |
|
NYJ | 8 | 57 | 34.5 | 11.5 | 2.4 | 276 | 3.0 | 3 | 193 | 1 | |
| 41 |
|
TEN | 16 | 56 | 32.3 | 9.7 | 3.7 | 517 | 3.3 | 1 | 400 | 1 | |
| 42 |
|
LV | 16 | 53 | 16.2 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 259 | 4.7 | 1 | 607 | 0 | |
| 43 |
|
BUF | 14 | 54 | 36.7 | 11.5 | 2.4 | 514 | 3.2 | 3 | 238 | 0 | |
| 44 |
|
LV | 16 | 52 | 45.2 | 10.8 | 1.1 | 723 | 4.2 | 4 | 116 | 0 | |
| 45 |
|
BAL | 10 | 60 | 41.1 | 11.4 | 1.5 | 411 | 3.6 | 7 | 105 | 1 | |
| 46 |
|
PHI | 4 | — | 46.0 | 11.2 | 1.2 | 184 | 4.1 | 3 | 20 | 0 | |
| 47 |
|
PIT | 9 | 55 | 28.4 | 6.2 | 2.9 | 256 | 4.6 | 0 | 199 | 3 | |
| 48 |
|
LAR | 9 | 49 | 44.8 | 7.4 | 0.6 | 403 | 6.0 | 2 | 41 | 1 | |
| 49 |
|
SEA | 15 | 53 | 34.3 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 514 | 4.6 | 4 | 214 | 1 | |
| 50 |
|
PHI | 6 | 56 | 20.0 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 120 | 4.1 | 1 | 160 | 2 | |
| 51 |
|
IND | 16 | 55 | 19.6 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 314 | 3.7 | 2 | 425 | 2 | |
| 52 |
|
DET | 7 | 53 | 37.9 | 7.9 | 1.0 | 265 | 4.8 | 3 | 56 | 0 | |
| 53 |
|
SF | 11 | 44 | 38.9 | 10.1 | 0.7 | 428 | 3.9 | 2 | 73 | 0 | |
| 54 |
|
MIN | 16 | 51 | 36.1 | 8.8 | 1.4 | 578 | 4.1 | 6 | 141 | 0 | |
| 55 |
|
WAS | 10 | 52 | 17.8 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 178 | 4.1 | 0 | 268 | 1 | |
| 56 |
|
PHI | 13 | 48 | 39.3 | 9.2 | 0.5 | 511 | 4.3 | 3 | 58 | 0 | |
| 57 |
|
JAX | 14 | 50 | 40.8 | 12.3 | 0.7 | 571 | 3.3 | 5 | 33 | 0 | |
| 58 |
|
BUF | 13 | 43 | 29.6 | 8.8 | 0.9 | 385 | 3.3 | 1 | 175 | 0 | |
| 59 |
|
DEN | 14 | 49 | 37.2 | 9.3 | 1.0 | 521 | 4.0 | 5 | 72 | 0 | |
| 60 |
|
GB | 16 | 47 | 29.0 | 7.6 | 1.7 | 464 | 3.8 | 3 | 210 | 0 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2018, ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.