Players 2022 final

1

Justin Tucker

BAL· 17 G

37 FG made

2

Jason Myers

SEA· 17 G

34 FG made

3

Daniel Carlson

LV· 17 G

34 FG made

4

Eddy Pineiro

CAR· 17 G

33 FG made

5

Younghoe Koo

ATL· 17 G

32 FG made

Kickers — 2022 · ranked by FG made

#	Player	Tm	G	Grade	FG/gm	Att/gm	FGM	FGA	FG%	50+	Long	PAT	Pts/gm
1	Justin Tucker	BAL	17	75	2.18	2.53	37	43	86.0%	9	58	31/32	8.4
2	Jason Myers	SEA	17	72	2.00	2.18	34	37	91.9%	6	56	41/42	8.4
3	Daniel Carlson	LV	17	69	2.00	2.18	34	37	91.9%	11	57	35/36	8.1
4	Eddy Pineiro	CAR	17	56	1.94	2.06	33	35	94.3%	2	54	30/32	7.6
5	Younghoe Koo	ATL	17	61	1.88	2.18	32	37	86.5%	7	54	33/35	7.6
6	Nick Folk	NE	17	57	1.88	2.18	32	37	86.5%	4	54	32/35	7.5
7	Ryan Succop	TB	17	42	1.82	2.24	31	38	81.6%	2	54	24/25	6.9
8	Chase McLaughlin	IND	16	53	1.88	2.25	30	36	83.3%	9	54	21/21	6.9
9	Greg Zuerlein	NYJ	17	49	1.76	2.18	30	37	81.1%	6	60	28/29	6.9
10	Riley Patterson	JAX	17	55	1.76	2.06	30	35	85.7%	2	53	36/37	7.4
11	Ka'imi Fairbairn	HOU	17	40	1.71	1.82	29	31	93.5%	6	56	24/24	6.5
12	Graham Gano	NYG	17	52	1.71	1.88	29	32	90.6%	8	57	32/34	7.0
13	Brett Maher	DAL	17	66	1.71	1.88	29	32	90.6%	9	60	50/53	8.1
14	Brandon McManus	DEN	17	40	1.65	2.12	28	36	77.8%	8	55	25/27	6.4
15	Matt Gay	LAR	17	46	1.65	1.76	28	30	93.3%	7	58	31/32	6.8
16	Robbie Gould	SF	17	58	1.59	1.88	27	32	84.4%	2	51	50/51	7.7
17	Tyler Bass	BUF	16	65	1.69	1.94	27	31	87.1%	2	56	48/50	8.1
18	Greg Joseph	MIN	17	46	1.53	1.94	26	33	78.8%	4	61	40/46	6.9
19	Jason Sanders	MIA	17	43	1.53	1.88	26	32	81.2%	2	55	41/44	7.0
20	Mason Crosby	GB	17	35	1.47	1.71	25	29	86.2%	1	56	37/39	6.6
21	Joey Slye	WAS	17	28	1.47	1.76	25	30	83.3%	4	58	24/28	5.8
22	Cade York	CLE	17	34	1.41	1.88	24	32	75.0%	4	58	35/37	6.3
23	Evan McPherson	CIN	16	50	1.50	1.81	24	29	82.8%	5	59	40/44	7.0
24	Mike Badgley	DET	13	63	1.85	2.15	24	28	85.7%	2	53	33/33	8.1
25	Wil Lutz	NO	17	31	1.35	1.82	23	31	74.2%	4	60	33/33	6.0
26	Matt Prater	ARI	13	37	1.69	1.92	22	25	88.0%	5	57	17/18	6.4
27	Cairo Santos	CHI	16	25	1.31	1.44	21	23	91.3%	4	51	27/32	5.6
28	Cameron Dicker	PHI	11	60	1.91	2.00	21	22	95.5%	0	48	24/24	7.9
29	Jake Elliott	PHI	16	48	1.25	1.44	20	23	87.0%	5	56	51/53	6.9
30	Chris Boswell	PIT	12	44	1.67	2.33	20	28	71.4%	7	59	18/18	6.5
31	Harrison Butker	KC	13	51	1.38	1.85	18	24	75.0%	3	62	38/41	7.1
32	Randy Bullock	TEN	15	18	1.13	1.33	17	20	85.0%	1	51	28/28	5.3
33	Matthew Wright	PIT	6	82	2.50	3.00	15	18	83.3%	2	59	15/15	10.0
34	Dustin Hopkins	LAC	5	—	1.80	2.00	9	10	90.0%	0	43	12/12	7.8
35	Matt Ammendola	KC	4	—	1.25	1.75	5	7	71.4%	0	31	5/7	5.0

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2022, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.