Players 2015 final
Kickers — 2015 · ranked by FG made
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | FG/gm | Att/gm | FGM | FGA | FG% | 50+ | Long | PAT | Pts/gm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
MIN | 16 | 69 | 2.12 | 2.44 | 39 | 87.2% | 6 | 54 | 33/37 | 8.4 | |
| 2 |
|
CHI | 16 | 63 | 2.06 | 2.44 | 39 | 84.6% | 7 | 55 | 28/29 | 7.9 | |
| 3 |
|
NE | 16 | 83 | 2.06 | 2.25 | 36 | 91.7% | 4 | 57 | 52/52 | 9.4 | |
| 4 |
|
BAL | 16 | 59 | 2.06 | 2.50 | 40 | 82.5% | 4 | 52 | 29/29 | 8.0 | |
| 5 |
|
CAR | 16 | 72 | 1.88 | 2.25 | 36 | 83.3% | 2 | 52 | 56/59 | 9.1 | |
| 6 |
|
NYG | 16 | 66 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 32 | 93.8% | 3 | 53 | 44/45 | 8.4 | |
| 7 |
|
DEN | 16 | 57 | 1.88 | 2.19 | 35 | 85.7% | 5 | 57 | 35/36 | 7.8 | |
| 8 |
|
DAL | 16 | 53 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 32 | 93.8% | 5 | 54 | 25/25 | 7.2 | |
| 9 |
|
KC | 16 | 61 | 1.88 | 2.31 | 37 | 81.1% | 4 | 53 | 39/41 | 8.1 | |
| 10 |
|
PIT | 12 | 76 | 2.42 | 2.67 | 32 | 90.6% | 2 | 51 | 26/27 | 9.4 | |
| 11 |
|
SEA | 16 | 61 | 1.81 | 1.94 | 31 | 93.5% | 6 | 54 | 40/44 | 7.9 | |
| 12 |
|
ARI | 16 | 66 | 1.75 | 1.94 | 31 | 90.3% | 0 | 47 | 53/58 | 8.6 | |
| 13 |
|
CLE | 16 | 42 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 32 | 87.5% | 0 | 47 | 22/24 | 6.6 | |
| 14 |
|
LAC | 16 | 46 | 1.62 | 2.00 | 32 | 81.2% | 4 | 54 | 28/32 | 6.6 | |
| 15 |
|
JAX | 16 | 50 | 1.62 | 1.88 | 30 | 86.7% | 3 | 58 | 32/39 | 6.9 | |
| 16 |
|
IND | 16 | 47 | 1.56 | 1.69 | 27 | 92.6% | 4 | 55 | 32/35 | 6.7 | |
| 17 |
|
WAS | 15 | 54 | 1.67 | 1.87 | 28 | 89.3% | 2 | 54 | 39/40 | 7.6 | |
| 18 |
|
GB | 16 | 48 | 1.50 | 1.75 | 28 | 85.7% | 4 | 56 | 36/36 | 6.8 | |
| 19 |
|
SF | 16 | 33 | 1.50 | 1.69 | 27 | 88.9% | 3 | 54 | 20/21 | 5.8 | |
| 20 |
|
CIN | 16 | 52 | 1.44 | 1.75 | 28 | 82.1% | 2 | 52 | 48/49 | 7.3 | |
| 21 |
|
BUF | 16 | 42 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 27 | 85.2% | 3 | 52 | 34/40 | 6.4 | |
| 22 |
|
TB | 12 | 55 | 1.92 | 2.33 | 28 | 82.1% | 3 | 53 | 25/26 | 7.8 | |
| 23 |
|
DET | 16 | 43 | 1.38 | 1.50 | 24 | 91.7% | 5 | 59 | 36/39 | 6.4 | |
| 24 |
|
LV | 16 | 38 | 1.31 | 1.62 | 26 | 80.8% | 4 | 56 | 38/39 | 6.3 | |
| 25 |
|
LAR | 14 | 37 | 1.43 | 2.14 | 30 | 66.7% | 3 | 61 | 26/28 | 6.1 | |
| 26 |
|
NYJ | 11 | 51 | 1.73 | 2.09 | 23 | 82.6% | 0 | 49 | 22/25 | 7.2 | |
| 27 |
|
PHI | 13 | 49 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 22 | 81.8% | 2 | 53 | 35/37 | 6.8 | |
| 28 |
|
HOU | 13 | 40 | 1.38 | 1.62 | 21 | 85.7% | 2 | 51 | 29/31 | 6.4 | |
| 29 |
|
ATL | 10 | 45 | 1.40 | 1.80 | 18 | 77.8% | 0 | 47 | 26/26 | 6.8 | |
| 30 |
|
TEN | 16 | 24 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 16 | 87.5% | 1 | 51 | 29/31 | 4.4 | |
| 31 |
|
NYJ | 7 | 58 | 1.86 | 2.29 | 16 | 81.2% | 2 | 55 | 19/19 | 8.3 | |
| 32 |
|
MIA | 16 | 28 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 16 | 81.2% | 1 | 53 | 33/36 | 4.5 | |
| 33 |
|
ATL | 5 | — | 2.20 | 2.60 | 13 | 84.6% | 3 | 54 | 8/8 | 8.2 | |
| 34 |
|
WAS | 11 | 35 | 0.91 | 1.36 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 57 | 34/35 | 5.8 | |
| 35 |
|
NO | 8 | 31 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 51 | 12/13 | 5.2 | |
| 36 |
|
TB | 4 | — | 1.50 | 3.00 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 58 | 6/8 | 6.0 | |
| 37 |
|
PIT | 4 | — | 1.50 | 2.50 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 45 | 6/7 | 6.0 | |
| 38 |
|
BUF | 14 | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | — | 0 | — | 0/0 | 0.0 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2015, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.