Players 2023 final
Quarterbacks — 2023 · ranked by Pass yards
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Yds/gm | Att/gm | Yds | TD | INT | Cmp% | Y/A | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
MIA | 17 | 66 | 272.0 | 32.9 | 29 | 14 | 69.3% | 8.3 | 74 | |
| 2 |
|
DET | 17 | 65 | 269.1 | 35.6 | 30 | 12 | 67.3% | 7.6 | 21 | |
| 3 |
|
DAL | 17 | 78 | 265.6 | 34.7 | 36 | 9 | 69.5% | 7.7 | 242 | |
| 4 |
|
BUF | 17 | 85 | 253.3 | 34.1 | 29 | 18 | 66.5% | 7.4 | 524 | |
| 5 |
|
SF | 16 | 74 | 267.5 | 27.8 | 31 | 11 | 69.4% | 9.6 | 144 | |
| 6 |
|
KC | 16 | 61 | 261.4 | 37.3 | 27 | 14 | 67.2% | 7.0 | 389 | |
| 7 |
|
GB | 17 | 68 | 244.6 | 34.1 | 32 | 11 | 64.2% | 7.2 | 247 | |
| 8 |
|
HOU | 15 | 64 | 273.9 | 33.3 | 23 | 5 | 63.9% | 8.2 | 167 | |
| 9 |
|
TB | 17 | 59 | 237.9 | 33.3 | 28 | 10 | 64.3% | 7.1 | 163 | |
| 10 |
|
JAX | 16 | 57 | 251.0 | 35.2 | 21 | 14 | 65.6% | 7.1 | 339 | |
| 11 |
|
LAR | 15 | 58 | 264.3 | 34.7 | 24 | 11 | 62.6% | 7.6 | 65 | |
| 12 |
|
WAS | 17 | 46 | 232.1 | 36.0 | 21 | 21 | 63.4% | 6.4 | 263 | |
| 13 |
|
NO | 17 | 53 | 228.1 | 32.2 | 25 | 8 | 68.4% | 7.1 | 40 | |
| 14 |
|
PHI | 17 | 70 | 226.9 | 31.6 | 23 | 15 | 65.4% | 7.2 | 605 | |
| 15 |
|
BAL | 16 | 72 | 229.9 | 28.6 | 24 | 7 | 67.2% | 8.0 | 821 | |
| 16 |
|
SEA | 15 | 56 | 241.6 | 33.3 | 20 | 9 | 64.7% | 7.3 | 155 | |
| 17 |
|
IND | 16 | 51 | 206.6 | 30.6 | 15 | 9 | 62.2% | 6.7 | 100 | |
| 18 |
|
LAC | 13 | 60 | 241.1 | 35.1 | 20 | 7 | 65.1% | 6.9 | 228 | |
| 19 |
|
DEN | 15 | 58 | 204.7 | 29.8 | 26 | 8 | 66.4% | 6.9 | 341 | |
| 20 |
|
CAR | 16 | 36 | 179.8 | 32.9 | 11 | 10 | 59.8% | 5.5 | 253 | |
| 21 |
|
ATL | 15 | 48 | 189.1 | 25.9 | 12 | 12 | 64.2% | 7.3 | 193 | |
| 22 |
|
CHI | 13 | 54 | 197.1 | 28.5 | 16 | 9 | 61.4% | 6.9 | 657 | |
| 23 |
|
MIN | 13 | 50 | 189.5 | 32.1 | 13 | 10 | 62.8% | 5.9 | 421 | |
| 24 |
|
MIN | 8 | 63 | 291.4 | 38.9 | 18 | 5 | 69.5% | 7.5 | 25 | |
| 25 |
|
CIN | 10 | 52 | 230.9 | 36.5 | 15 | 6 | 66.8% | 6.3 | 88 | |
| 26 |
|
NYJ | 12 | 40 | 189.2 | 30.7 | 8 | 7 | 60.1% | 6.2 | 211 | |
| 27 |
|
LV | 11 | 47 | 201.6 | 31.2 | 12 | 7 | 62.1% | 6.5 | 11 | |
| 28 |
|
NE | 11 | 42 | 192.7 | 31.4 | 10 | 12 | 64.9% | 6.1 | 96 | |
| 29 |
|
PIT | 12 | 42 | 172.5 | 27.0 | 6 | 4 | 62.0% | 6.4 | 54 | |
| 30 |
|
CIN | 9 | 55 | 215.1 | 27.0 | 12 | 7 | 70.4% | 8.0 | 127 | |
| 31 |
|
TEN | 9 | 48 | 200.9 | 28.3 | 8 | 4 | 58.4% | 7.1 | 57 | |
| 32 |
|
ARI | 8 | 52 | 224.9 | 33.5 | 10 | 5 | 65.7% | 6.7 | 244 | |
| 33 |
|
TEN | 9 | 41 | 179.6 | 25.6 | 4 | 7 | 64.8% | 7.0 | 74 | |
| 34 |
|
CLE | 5 | — | 323.2 | 40.8 | 13 | 8 | 60.3% | 7.9 | 2 | |
| 35 |
|
NYG | 10 | 45 | 134.1 | 18.0 | 5 | 3 | 64.4% | 7.5 | 197 | |
| 36 |
|
MIN | 5 | — | 261.2 | 29.6 | 7 | 8 | 67.6% | 8.8 | 25 | |
| 37 |
|
NE | 10 | 28 | 127.2 | 21.2 | 6 | 9 | 59.9% | 6.0 | 83 | |
| 38 |
|
LV | 7 | 44 | 172.1 | 24.1 | 7 | 9 | 65.1% | 7.1 | 39 | |
| 39 |
|
LAC | 5 | — | 225.8 | 34.8 | 3 | 1 | 63.8% | 6.5 | 144 | |
| 40 |
|
CLE | 6 | 49 | 185.8 | 28.5 | 7 | 4 | 61.4% | 6.5 | 142 | |
| 41 |
|
NYG | 9 | 43 | 122.3 | 19.8 | 8 | 3 | 64.0% | 6.2 | 195 | |
| 42 |
|
NYG | 6 | 37 | 151.5 | 26.7 | 2 | 6 | 67.5% | 5.7 | 206 | |
| 43 |
|
ATL | 5 | — | 178.0 | 27.2 | 5 | 4 | 54.4% | 6.5 | 124 | |
| 44 |
|
CHI | 5 | — | 171.8 | 28.6 | 3 | 6 | 65.7% | 6.0 | 109 | |
| 45 |
|
NYJ | 5 | — | 144.8 | 30.6 | 2 | 4 | 56.2% | 4.7 | 40 | |
| 46 |
|
PIT | 4 | — | 179.8 | 18.5 | 3 | 0 | 74.3% | 9.7 | 8 | |
| 47 |
|
CLE | 5 | — | 134.8 | 22.2 | 1 | 5 | 48.6% | 6.1 | 30 | |
| 48 |
|
PIT | 5 | — | 126.4 | 21.4 | 4 | 5 | 62.6% | 5.9 | 54 | |
| 49 |
|
IND | 4 | — | 144.2 | 21.0 | 3 | 1 | 59.5% | 6.9 | 136 | |
| 50 |
|
SEA | 4 | — | 135.8 | 19.0 | 3 | 3 | 63.2% | 7.1 | 14 | |
| 51 |
|
CLE | 7 | 22 | 62.9 | 16.0 | 1 | 4 | 53.6% | 3.9 | 65 | |
| 52 |
|
JAX | 6 | 39 | 58.2 | 8.8 | 1 | 0 | 75.5% | 6.6 | 35 | |
| 53 |
|
SF | 10 | 34 | 29.7 | 4.6 | 2 | 1 | 60.9% | 6.5 | 15 | |
| 54 |
|
NO | 6 | 35 | 44.0 | 7.8 | 2 | 3 | 53.2% | 5.6 | -6 | |
| 55 |
|
BAL | 5 | — | 40.6 | 7.4 | 3 | 0 | 56.8% | 5.5 | 55 | |
| 56 |
|
HOU | 5 | — | 34.6 | 7.8 | 2 | 0 | 46.2% | 4.4 | 9 | |
| 57 |
|
DAL | 7 | 26 | 20.6 | 3.4 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% | 6.0 | -5 | |
| 58 |
|
MIA | 6 | 30 | 12.3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% | 12.3 | -9 | |
| 59 |
|
ARI | 6 | 15 | 10.3 | 3.5 | 0 | 2 | 57.1% | 3.0 | 30 | |
| 60 |
|
BUF | 6 | 32 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | -13 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2023, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.