Players 2015 final

1

Julio Jones

ATL· 16 G

1871 Rec yards

2

Antonio Brown

PIT· 16 G

1834 Rec yards

3

DeAndre Hopkins

HOU· 16 G

1521 Rec yards

4

Brandon Marshall

NYJ· 16 G

1502 Rec yards

5

Odell Beckham Jr.

NYG· 15 G

1450 Rec yards

Wide receivers — 2015 · ranked by Rec yards

#	Player	Tm	G	Grade	Yds/gm	Rec/gm	Tgt/gm	Rec yds	Rec	TD	Y/R	Catch%	Tgt share	WOPR
1	Julio Jones	ATL	16	86	116.9	8.5	12.7	1871	136	8	13.8	67.0%	32.9%	0.79
2	Antonio Brown	PIT	16	91	114.6	8.5	12.1	1834	136	10	13.5	70.5%	33.6%	0.77
3	DeAndre Hopkins	HOU	16	79	95.1	6.9	12.0	1521	111	11	13.7	57.8%	32.0%	0.81
4	Brandon Marshall	NYJ	16	83	93.9	6.8	10.8	1502	109	14	13.8	63.0%	29.3%	0.71
5	Odell Beckham Jr.	NYG	15	81	96.7	6.4	10.5	1450	96	13	15.1	60.8%	27.3%	0.69
6	Allen Robinson	JAX	16	78	87.5	5.0	9.4	1400	80	14	17.5	53.0%	25.4%	0.66
7	Demaryius Thomas	DEN	16	74	81.5	6.6	11.1	1304	105	6	12.4	59.3%	29.5%	0.68
8	A.J. Green	CIN	16	75	81.1	5.4	8.2	1297	86	10	15.1	65.2%	26.4%	0.66
9	Larry Fitzgerald	ARI	16	77	75.9	6.8	9.1	1215	109	9	11.1	75.2%	27.1%	0.55
10	Calvin Johnson	DET	16	73	75.9	5.5	9.3	1214	88	9	13.8	59.1%	24.0%	0.69
11	Mike Evans	TB	15	66	80.4	4.9	9.9	1206	74	3	16.3	50.0%	29.7%	0.74
12	Jarvis Landry	MIA	16	69	72.3	6.9	10.4	1157	110	4	10.5	66.3%	28.5%	0.60
13	Brandin Cooks	NO	16	68	71.1	5.2	8.1	1138	84	9	13.5	65.1%	19.6%	0.51
14	Emmanuel Sanders	DEN	15	67	75.7	5.1	9.1	1135	76	6	14.9	55.5%	24.0%	0.62
15	T.Y. Hilton	IND	16	65	70.2	4.3	8.4	1124	69	5	16.3	51.5%	22.0%	0.56
16	Jeremy Maclin	KC	15	71	72.5	5.8	8.3	1088	87	8	12.5	70.2%	29.4%	0.78
17	Amari Cooper	LV	16	66	66.9	4.5	8.1	1070	72	6	14.9	55.4%	21.7%	0.52
18	Doug Baldwin	SEA	16	72	66.8	4.9	6.4	1069	78	14	13.7	75.7%	21.5%	0.48
19	Sammy Watkins	BUF	13	70	80.5	4.6	7.4	1047	60	9	17.4	62.5%	28.8%	0.75
20	Allen Hurns	JAX	15	68	68.7	4.3	7.0	1031	64	10	16.1	61.0%	18.4%	0.43
21	Eric Decker	NYJ	15	71	68.5	5.3	8.8	1027	80	12	12.8	60.6%	24.2%	0.58
22	John Brown	ARI	15	65	66.9	4.3	6.7	1003	65	7	15.4	64.4%	19.6%	0.47
23	Willie Snead	NO	15	63	65.6	4.6	6.7	984	69	3	14.3	68.3%	16.0%	0.38
24	Travis Benjamin	CLE	16	64	60.4	4.2	7.8	966	68	5	14.2	54.4%	20.5%	0.53
25	Kamar Aiken	BAL	16	64	59.0	4.7	7.9	944	75	5	12.6	59.1%	19.0%	0.50
26	Michael Crabtree	LV	16	67	57.6	5.3	9.1	922	85	9	10.8	58.2%	24.6%	0.59
27	James Jones	GB	16	63	55.6	3.1	6.2	890	50	8	17.8	50.5%	18.0%	0.50
28	Michael Floyd	ARI	15	62	56.6	3.5	5.9	849	52	6	16.3	58.4%	17.0%	0.43
29	Terrance Williams	DAL	16	57	52.5	3.2	5.8	840	52	3	16.2	55.9%	18.0%	0.47
30	Randall Cobb	GB	16	64	51.8	4.9	8.1	829	79	6	10.5	61.2%	23.6%	0.51
31	Marvin Jones	CIN	16	60	51.0	4.1	6.4	816	65	4	12.6	63.1%	20.9%	0.52
32	Golden Tate	DET	16	65	50.8	5.6	8.0	813	90	6	9.0	70.3%	20.7%	0.43
33	Alshon Jeffery	CHI	9	70	89.7	6.0	10.4	807	54	4	14.9	57.4%	31.1%	0.81
34	Rueben Randle	NYG	16	61	49.8	3.6	5.6	797	57	8	14.0	63.3%	15.2%	0.39
35	Anquan Boldin	SF	14	63	56.4	4.9	7.9	789	69	4	11.4	62.2%	24.5%	0.56
36	Pierre Garcon	WAS	16	61	48.6	4.5	6.9	777	72	6	10.8	64.9%	19.7%	0.47
37	Martavis Bryant	PIT	11	66	69.5	4.5	8.4	765	50	6	15.3	54.3%	21.8%	0.52
38	Markus Wheaton	PIT	16	58	46.8	2.8	4.9	749	44	5	17.0	55.7%	12.9%	0.32
39	Ted Ginn	CAR	15	61	49.3	2.9	6.4	739	44	10	16.8	45.8%	19.9%	0.50
40	Donte Moncrief	IND	16	60	45.8	4.0	6.6	733	64	6	11.5	61.0%	17.0%	0.39
41	Keenan Allen	LAC	8	76	90.6	8.4	11.1	725	67	4	10.8	75.3%	25.2%	0.59
42	Stefon Diggs	MIN	13	62	55.4	4.0	6.5	720	52	4	13.8	61.9%	21.8%	0.55
43	Julian Edelman	NE	9	72	76.9	6.8	9.8	692	61	7	11.3	69.3%	23.9%	0.54
44	Jermaine Kearse	SEA	16	57	42.8	3.1	4.2	685	49	5	14.0	72.1%	14.1%	0.36
45	Kenny Britt	LAR	16	54	42.6	2.2	4.5	681	36	3	18.9	50.0%	15.0%	0.45
46	Steve Smith	BAL	7	69	95.7	6.6	10.4	670	46	3	14.6	63.0%	25.0%	0.59
47	Tyler Lockett	SEA	16	58	41.5	3.2	4.3	664	51	6	13.0	73.9%	14.8%	0.38
48	Torrey Smith	SF	16	54	41.4	2.1	3.9	663	33	4	20.1	53.2%	11.8%	0.33
49	Rishard Matthews	MIA	11	61	60.2	3.9	5.5	662	43	4	15.4	70.5%	15.2%	0.39
50	Nate Washington	HOU	13	59	50.6	3.6	7.2	658	47	4	14.0	50.0%	19.2%	0.45
51	Danny Amendola	NE	14	59	46.3	4.6	6.2	648	65	3	10.0	74.7%	15.9%	0.34
52	Jamison Crowder	WAS	16	55	37.8	3.7	4.9	604	59	2	10.2	75.6%	13.8%	0.28
53	Malcom Floyd	LAC	15	51	37.4	2.0	4.6	561	30	3	18.7	43.5%	10.9%	0.37
54	Robert Woods	BUF	14	55	39.4	3.4	5.7	552	47	3	11.7	58.8%	18.3%	0.40
55	Dorial Green-Beckham	TEN	14	53	39.2	2.3	4.8	549	32	4	17.2	47.8%	13.9%	0.36
56	Vincent Jackson	TB	10	59	54.3	3.3	6.2	543	33	3	16.5	53.2%	20.0%	0.50
57	Cole Beasley	DAL	16	55	33.5	3.2	4.7	536	52	5	10.3	69.3%	14.0%	0.27
58	DeSean Jackson	WAS	9	60	58.7	3.3	5.4	528	30	4	17.6	61.2%	17.3%	0.50
59	Brian Hartline	CLE	12	56	43.6	3.8	6.4	523	46	2	11.4	59.7%	17.3%	0.39
60	Marques Colston	NO	13	56	40.0	3.5	5.2	520	45	4	11.6	67.2%	12.4%	0.29

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2015, ranked by Rec yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.