Players 2019 final
Running backs — 2019 · ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Scrim/gm | Rush/gm | Car/gm | Rec/gm | Rush yds | YPC | Rush TD | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
CAR | 16 | 89 | 86.7 | 17.9 | 7.2 | 1387 | 4.8 | 15 | 1005 | 4 | |
| 2 |
|
MIN | 14 | 83 | 81.1 | 17.9 | 3.8 | 1135 | 4.5 | 13 | 519 | 0 | |
| 3 |
|
TEN | 15 | 78 | 102.7 | 20.2 | 1.2 | 1540 | 5.1 | 16 | 206 | 2 | |
| 4 |
|
JAX | 15 | 72 | 76.8 | 17.7 | 5.1 | 1152 | 4.3 | 3 | 522 | 0 | |
| 5 |
|
DAL | 16 | 80 | 84.8 | 18.8 | 3.4 | 1357 | 4.5 | 12 | 420 | 2 | |
| 6 |
|
NYG | 13 | 74 | 77.2 | 16.7 | 4.0 | 1003 | 4.6 | 6 | 438 | 2 | |
| 7 |
|
CLE | 16 | 73 | 93.4 | 18.6 | 2.2 | 1494 | 5.0 | 8 | 278 | 0 | |
| 8 |
|
LV | 13 | 68 | 88.5 | 18.6 | 1.5 | 1150 | 4.8 | 7 | 166 | 0 | |
| 9 |
|
SEA | 15 | 69 | 82.0 | 18.5 | 2.5 | 1230 | 4.4 | 7 | 266 | 2 | |
| 10 |
|
GB | 16 | 76 | 67.8 | 14.8 | 3.1 | 1084 | 4.6 | 16 | 474 | 3 | |
| 11 |
|
LAC | 16 | 75 | 34.8 | 8.2 | 5.8 | 557 | 4.2 | 3 | 993 | 8 | |
| 12 |
|
NO | 14 | 71 | 56.9 | 12.2 | 5.8 | 797 | 4.7 | 5 | 533 | 1 | |
| 13 |
|
CIN | 16 | 66 | 71.1 | 17.4 | 2.2 | 1137 | 4.1 | 5 | 287 | 3 | |
| 14 |
|
BAL | 15 | 70 | 67.9 | 13.5 | 1.7 | 1018 | 5.0 | 10 | 247 | 5 | |
| 15 |
|
IND | 14 | 63 | 77.9 | 17.6 | 1.0 | 1091 | 4.4 | 8 | 82 | 0 | |
| 16 |
|
NYJ | 15 | 65 | 52.6 | 16.3 | 4.4 | 789 | 3.2 | 3 | 461 | 1 | |
| 17 |
|
MIA | 14 | 66 | 58.4 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 817 | 4.8 | 8 | 345 | 0 | |
| 18 |
|
PHI | 16 | 65 | 51.1 | 11.2 | 3.1 | 818 | 4.6 | 3 | 509 | 3 | |
| 19 |
|
BUF | 12 | 62 | 64.6 | 12.6 | 2.4 | 775 | 5.1 | 2 | 194 | 2 | |
| 20 |
|
ATL | 14 | 64 | 46.9 | 13.1 | 4.2 | 656 | 3.6 | 2 | 410 | 4 | |
| 21 |
|
LAC | 12 | 67 | 51.0 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 612 | 3.8 | 8 | 296 | 1 | |
| 22 |
|
DEN | 16 | 61 | 63.2 | 14.0 | 2.2 | 1011 | 4.5 | 7 | 196 | 0 | |
| 23 |
|
PIT | 10 | 64 | 46.4 | 11.6 | 3.4 | 464 | 4.0 | 4 | 251 | 3 | |
| 24 |
|
LAR | 15 | 68 | 57.1 | 14.9 | 2.1 | 857 | 3.8 | 12 | 207 | 2 | |
| 25 |
|
HOU | 16 | 59 | 66.9 | 15.3 | 0.6 | 1070 | 4.4 | 6 | 42 | 0 | |
| 26 |
|
WAS | 15 | 59 | 59.9 | 14.1 | 1.1 | 898 | 4.3 | 5 | 142 | 0 | |
| 27 |
|
CHI | 16 | 61 | 55.6 | 15.1 | 1.6 | 889 | 3.7 | 6 | 185 | 1 | |
| 28 |
|
DET | 8 | 58 | 50.4 | 14.1 | 1.2 | 403 | 3.6 | 3 | 127 | 1 | |
| 29 |
|
PHI | 9 | 63 | 58.3 | 13.2 | 1.1 | 525 | 4.4 | 6 | 69 | 1 | |
| 30 |
|
WAS | 5 | — | 49.0 | 8.4 | 1.4 | 245 | 5.8 | 2 | 79 | 1 | |
| 31 |
|
KC | 11 | 62 | 45.3 | 10.1 | 2.7 | 498 | 4.5 | 5 | 213 | 2 | |
| 32 |
|
TB | 16 | 58 | 45.2 | 10.8 | 1.9 | 724 | 4.2 | 6 | 309 | 0 | |
| 33 |
|
DET | 6 | 53 | 62.8 | 14.8 | 0.2 | 377 | 4.2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| 34 |
|
NE | 16 | 57 | 57.0 | 15.4 | 0.8 | 912 | 3.7 | 7 | 94 | 0 | |
| 35 |
|
SF | 12 | 53 | 51.9 | 10.2 | 1.6 | 623 | 5.1 | 1 | 120 | 1 | |
| 36 |
|
NE | 15 | 60 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 263 | 3.9 | 1 | 645 | 5 | |
| 37 |
|
ARI | 12 | 60 | 28.8 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 345 | 3.7 | 2 | 370 | 4 | |
| 38 |
|
SF | 16 | 60 | 48.2 | 8.6 | 0.9 | 772 | 5.6 | 8 | 180 | 2 | |
| 39 |
|
IND | 5 | — | 47.0 | 9.8 | 1.0 | 235 | 4.8 | 1 | 59 | 0 | |
| 40 |
|
CLE | 8 | 58 | 22.4 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 179 | 4.2 | 2 | 285 | 1 | |
| 41 |
|
NO | 16 | 56 | 39.8 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 637 | 4.4 | 5 | 235 | 1 | |
| 42 |
|
SF | 14 | 55 | 38.9 | 9.8 | 1.5 | 544 | 4.0 | 6 | 180 | 1 | |
| 43 |
|
HOU | 16 | 56 | 25.6 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 410 | 4.9 | 2 | 410 | 3 | |
| 44 |
|
GB | 14 | 57 | 32.9 | 7.6 | 2.8 | 460 | 4.3 | 1 | 253 | 5 | |
| 45 |
|
SEA | 9 | 55 | 41.1 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 370 | 5.7 | 3 | 83 | 1 | |
| 46 |
|
PHI | 9 | 57 | 27.2 | 6.8 | 2.7 | 245 | 4.0 | 5 | 204 | 0 | |
| 47 |
|
KC | 13 | 55 | 35.8 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 465 | 4.6 | 4 | 181 | 1 | |
| 48 |
|
BAL | 16 | 48 | 44.4 | 8.3 | 0.4 | 711 | 5.3 | 2 | 45 | 0 | |
| 49 |
|
DEN | 16 | 54 | 31.0 | 8.2 | 2.7 | 496 | 3.8 | 3 | 256 | 1 | |
| 50 |
|
WAS | 11 | 52 | 12.5 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 138 | 3.7 | 0 | 378 | 0 | |
| 51 |
|
BUF | 4 | — | 15.8 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 63 | 3.7 | 0 | 124 | 0 | |
| 52 |
|
BUF | 15 | 50 | 39.9 | 11.1 | 0.9 | 599 | 3.6 | 2 | 100 | 0 | |
| 53 |
|
MIA | 8 | 54 | 21.0 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 168 | 2.7 | 1 | 204 | 0 | |
| 54 |
|
NE | 13 | 52 | 23.2 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 302 | 4.6 | 3 | 279 | 0 | |
| 55 |
|
LV | 16 | 51 | 24.2 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 387 | 3.6 | 3 | 292 | 0 | |
| 56 |
|
MIN | 13 | 47 | 35.5 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 462 | 4.6 | 1 | 82 | 0 | |
| 57 |
|
CHI | 16 | 54 | 13.3 | 4.0 | 4.9 | 213 | 3.3 | 0 | 456 | 3 | |
| 58 |
|
MIA | 7 | 49 | 28.7 | 7.6 | 2.1 | 201 | 3.8 | 0 | 89 | 0 | |
| 59 |
|
PIT | 11 | 48 | 38.7 | 9.8 | 0.3 | 426 | 3.9 | 2 | 23 | 0 | |
| 60 |
|
DAL | 14 | 49 | 32.5 | 6.1 | 1.1 | 455 | 5.3 | 2 | 107 | 1 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2019, ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.