BallKnowMe
More
NFL
1–1 · 50% · every call graded in public record →

Players 2019 final

Running backs — 2019 · ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm

#PlayerTmG Grade Scrim/gm Rush/gm Car/gm Rec/gm Rush yds YPC Rush TD Rec yds Rec TD
1 Christian McCaffrey CAR 16 89 149.5 86.7 17.9 7.2 1387 4.8 15 1005 4
2 Dalvin Cook MIN 14 83 118.1 81.1 17.9 3.8 1135 4.5 13 519 0
3 Derrick Henry TEN 15 78 116.4 102.7 20.2 1.2 1540 5.1 16 206 2
4 Leonard Fournette JAX 15 72 111.6 76.8 17.7 5.1 1152 4.3 3 522 0
5 Ezekiel Elliott DAL 16 80 111.1 84.8 18.8 3.4 1357 4.5 12 420 2
6 Saquon Barkley NYG 13 74 110.8 77.2 16.7 4.0 1003 4.6 6 438 2
7 Nick Chubb CLE 16 73 110.8 93.4 18.6 2.2 1494 5.0 8 278 0
8 Josh Jacobs LV 13 68 101.2 88.5 18.6 1.5 1150 4.8 7 166 0
9 Chris Carson SEA 15 69 99.7 82.0 18.5 2.5 1230 4.4 7 266 2
10 Aaron Jones GB 16 76 97.4 67.8 14.8 3.1 1084 4.6 16 474 3
11 Austin Ekeler LAC 16 75 96.9 34.8 8.2 5.8 557 4.2 3 993 8
12 Alvin Kamara NO 14 71 95.0 56.9 12.2 5.8 797 4.7 5 533 1
13 Joe Mixon CIN 16 66 89.0 71.1 17.4 2.2 1137 4.1 5 287 3
14 Mark Ingram BAL 15 70 84.3 67.9 13.5 1.7 1018 5.0 10 247 5
15 Marlon Mack IND 14 63 83.8 77.9 17.6 1.0 1091 4.4 8 82 0
16 Le'Veon Bell NYJ 15 65 83.3 52.6 16.3 4.4 789 3.2 3 461 1
17 Kenyan Drake MIA 14 66 83.0 58.4 12.1 3.6 817 4.8 8 345 0
18 Miles Sanders PHI 16 65 82.9 51.1 11.2 3.1 818 4.6 3 509 3
19 Devin Singletary BUF 12 62 80.8 64.6 12.6 2.4 775 5.1 2 194 2
20 Devonta Freeman ATL 14 64 76.1 46.9 13.1 4.2 656 3.6 2 410 4
21 Melvin Gordon LAC 12 67 75.7 51.0 13.5 3.5 612 3.8 8 296 1
22 Phillip Lindsay DEN 16 61 75.4 63.2 14.0 2.2 1011 4.5 7 196 0
23 James Conner PIT 10 64 71.5 46.4 11.6 3.4 464 4.0 4 251 3
24 Todd Gurley LAR 15 68 70.9 57.1 14.9 2.1 857 3.8 12 207 2
25 Carlos Hyde HOU 16 59 69.5 66.9 15.3 0.6 1070 4.4 6 42 0
26 Adrian Peterson WAS 15 59 69.3 59.9 14.1 1.1 898 4.3 5 142 0
27 David Montgomery CHI 16 61 67.1 55.6 15.1 1.6 889 3.7 6 185 1
28 Kerryon Johnson DET 8 58 66.2 50.4 14.1 1.2 403 3.6 3 127 1
29 Jordan Howard PHI 9 63 66.0 58.3 13.2 1.1 525 4.4 6 69 1
30 Derrius Guice WAS 5 64.8 49.0 8.4 1.4 245 5.8 2 79 1
31 Damien Williams KC 11 62 64.6 45.3 10.1 2.7 498 4.5 5 213 2
32 Ronald Jones TB 16 58 64.6 45.2 10.8 1.9 724 4.2 6 309 0
33 Bo Scarbrough DET 6 53 63.7 62.8 14.8 0.2 377 4.2 1 5 0
34 Sony Michel NE 16 57 62.9 57.0 15.4 0.8 912 3.7 7 94 0
35 Matt Breida SF 12 53 61.9 51.9 10.2 1.6 623 5.1 1 120 1
36 James White NE 15 60 60.5 17.5 4.5 4.8 263 3.9 1 645 5
37 David Johnson ARI 12 60 59.6 28.8 7.8 3.0 345 3.7 2 370 4
38 Raheem Mostert SF 16 60 59.5 48.2 8.6 0.9 772 5.6 8 180 2
39 Jonathan Williams IND 5 58.8 47.0 9.8 1.0 235 4.8 1 59 0
40 Kareem Hunt CLE 8 58 58.0 22.4 5.4 4.6 179 4.2 2 285 1
41 Latavius Murray NO 16 56 54.5 39.8 9.1 2.1 637 4.4 5 235 1
42 Tevin Coleman SF 14 55 51.7 38.9 9.8 1.5 544 4.0 6 180 1
43 Duke Johnson HOU 16 56 51.2 25.6 5.2 2.8 410 4.9 2 410 3
44 Jamaal Williams GB 14 57 50.9 32.9 7.6 2.8 460 4.3 1 253 5
45 Rashaad Penny SEA 9 55 50.3 41.1 7.2 0.9 370 5.7 3 83 1
46 Boston Scott PHI 9 57 49.9 27.2 6.8 2.7 245 4.0 5 204 0
47 LeSean McCoy KC 13 55 49.7 35.8 7.8 2.2 465 4.6 4 181 1
48 Gus Edwards BAL 16 48 47.2 44.4 8.3 0.4 711 5.3 2 45 0
49 Royce Freeman DEN 16 54 47.0 31.0 8.2 2.7 496 3.8 3 256 1
50 Chris Thompson WAS 11 52 46.9 12.5 3.4 3.8 138 3.7 0 378 0
51 T.J. Yeldon BUF 4 46.8 15.8 4.2 3.2 63 3.7 0 124 0
52 Frank Gore BUF 15 50 46.6 39.9 11.1 0.9 599 3.6 2 100 0
53 Patrick Laird MIA 8 54 46.5 21.0 7.8 2.9 168 2.7 1 204 0
54 Rex Burkhead NE 13 52 44.7 23.2 5.0 2.1 302 4.6 3 279 0
55 DeAndre Washington LV 16 51 42.4 24.2 6.8 2.2 387 3.6 3 292 0
56 Alexander Mattison MIN 13 47 41.8 35.5 7.7 0.8 462 4.6 1 82 0
57 Tarik Cohen CHI 16 54 41.8 13.3 4.0 4.9 213 3.3 0 456 3
58 Mark Walton MIA 7 49 41.4 28.7 7.6 2.1 201 3.8 0 89 0
59 Benny Snell PIT 11 48 40.8 38.7 9.8 0.3 426 3.9 2 23 0
60 Tony Pollard DAL 14 49 40.1 32.5 6.1 1.1 455 5.3 2 107 1

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2019, ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.