BallKnowMe
More
NFL
1–1 · 50% · every call graded in public record →

Players 2023 final

Kickers — 2023 · ranked by FG made

#PlayerTmG Grade FG/gm Att/gm FGM FGA FG% 50+ Long PAT Pts/gm
1 Brandon Aubrey DAL 17 83 2.12 2.24 36 38 94.7% 10 60 49/52 9.2
2 Jason Myers SEA 17 62 2.06 2.47 35 42 83.3% 4 55 33/33 8.1
3 Greg Zuerlein NYJ 16 54 2.19 2.38 35 38 92.1% 5 55 15/16 7.5
4 Cairo Santos CHI 17 67 2.06 2.24 35 38 92.1% 7 55 31/33 8.0
5 Matt Gay IND 17 62 1.94 2.41 33 41 80.5% 8 57 35/36 7.9
6 Dustin Hopkins CLE 15 69 2.20 2.40 33 36 91.7% 8 58 24/26 8.2
7 Harrison Butker KC 17 62 1.94 2.06 33 35 94.3% 5 60 38/38 8.1
8 Younghoe Koo ATL 17 51 1.88 2.18 32 37 86.5% 3 54 27/28 7.2
9 Justin Tucker BAL 17 72 1.88 2.18 32 37 86.5% 1 50 51/52 8.6
10 Cameron Dicker LAC 17 56 1.82 1.94 31 33 93.9% 7 55 35/35 7.5
11 Blake Grupe NO 17 57 1.76 2.18 30 37 81.1% 6 55 40/40 7.6
12 Jake Elliott PHI 17 62 1.76 1.88 30 32 93.8% 7 61 45/46 7.9
13 Wil Lutz DEN 17 45 1.76 2.00 30 34 88.2% 3 52 29/31 7.0
14 Brandon McManus JAX 17 53 1.76 2.18 30 37 81.1% 5 56 35/35 7.4
15 Nick Folk TEN 17 43 1.71 1.76 29 30 96.7% 5 53 28/30 6.8
16 Chase McLaughlin TB 17 52 1.71 1.82 29 31 93.5% 7 57 33/33 7.1
17 Chris Boswell PIT 17 43 1.71 1.82 29 31 93.5% 6 57 27/28 6.7
18 Matt Prater ARI 17 40 1.65 1.94 28 33 84.8% 9 62 22/23 6.2
19 Anders Carlson GB 17 41 1.59 1.94 27 33 81.8% 3 53 34/39 6.8
20 Ka'imi Fairbairn HOU 12 76 2.25 2.33 27 28 96.4% 5 54 21/22 8.5
21 Daniel Carlson LV 17 37 1.53 1.76 26 30 86.7% 1 54 32/32 6.5
22 Evan McPherson CIN 17 48 1.53 1.82 26 31 83.9% 7 56 40/40 6.9
23 Eddy Pineiro CAR 15 35 1.67 1.93 25 29 86.2% 5 56 17/20 6.1
24 Jason Sanders MIA 17 56 1.41 1.65 24 28 85.7% 5 57 58/59 7.6
25 Tyler Bass BUF 17 48 1.41 1.71 24 29 82.8% 4 54 49/50 7.1
26 Greg Joseph MIN 17 38 1.41 1.76 24 30 80.0% 4 54 36/38 6.4
27 Jake Moody SF 17 48 1.24 1.47 21 25 84.0% 2 57 60/61 7.2
28 Joey Slye WAS 17 28 1.12 1.41 19 24 79.2% 3 61 32/35 5.2
29 Brett Maher LAR 8 59 2.12 2.88 17 23 73.9% 3 54 13/15 8.0
30 Chad Ryland NE 17 17 0.94 1.47 16 25 64.0% 2 56 24/25 4.2
31 Riley Patterson DET 15 33 1.07 1.20 16 18 88.9% 1 52 41/44 5.9
32 Lucas Havrisik LAR 9 46 1.67 2.22 15 20 75.0% 2 52 19/22 7.1
33 Graham Gano NYG 8 31 1.38 2.12 11 17 64.7% 3 57 8/8 5.1
34 Matt Ammendola HOU 5 1.20 1.80 6 9 66.7% 0 45 10/11 5.6
35 Randy Bullock NYG 6 24 0.83 1.00 5 6 83.3% 1 56 10/10 4.2
36 Mike Badgley DET 4 1.00 1.00 4 4 100.0% 0 41 13/15 6.2

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2023, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.