Players 2023 final
Kickers — 2023 · ranked by FG made
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | FG/gm | Att/gm | FGM | FGA | FG% | 50+ | Long | PAT | Pts/gm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
DAL | 17 | 83 | 2.12 | 2.24 | 38 | 94.7% | 10 | 60 | 49/52 | 9.2 | |
| 2 |
|
SEA | 17 | 62 | 2.06 | 2.47 | 42 | 83.3% | 4 | 55 | 33/33 | 8.1 | |
| 3 |
|
NYJ | 16 | 54 | 2.19 | 2.38 | 38 | 92.1% | 5 | 55 | 15/16 | 7.5 | |
| 4 |
|
CHI | 17 | 67 | 2.06 | 2.24 | 38 | 92.1% | 7 | 55 | 31/33 | 8.0 | |
| 5 |
|
IND | 17 | 62 | 1.94 | 2.41 | 41 | 80.5% | 8 | 57 | 35/36 | 7.9 | |
| 6 |
|
CLE | 15 | 69 | 2.20 | 2.40 | 36 | 91.7% | 8 | 58 | 24/26 | 8.2 | |
| 7 |
|
KC | 17 | 62 | 1.94 | 2.06 | 35 | 94.3% | 5 | 60 | 38/38 | 8.1 | |
| 8 |
|
ATL | 17 | 51 | 1.88 | 2.18 | 37 | 86.5% | 3 | 54 | 27/28 | 7.2 | |
| 9 |
|
BAL | 17 | 72 | 1.88 | 2.18 | 37 | 86.5% | 1 | 50 | 51/52 | 8.6 | |
| 10 |
|
LAC | 17 | 56 | 1.82 | 1.94 | 33 | 93.9% | 7 | 55 | 35/35 | 7.5 | |
| 11 |
|
NO | 17 | 57 | 1.76 | 2.18 | 37 | 81.1% | 6 | 55 | 40/40 | 7.6 | |
| 12 |
|
PHI | 17 | 62 | 1.76 | 1.88 | 32 | 93.8% | 7 | 61 | 45/46 | 7.9 | |
| 13 |
|
DEN | 17 | 45 | 1.76 | 2.00 | 34 | 88.2% | 3 | 52 | 29/31 | 7.0 | |
| 14 |
|
JAX | 17 | 53 | 1.76 | 2.18 | 37 | 81.1% | 5 | 56 | 35/35 | 7.4 | |
| 15 |
|
TEN | 17 | 43 | 1.71 | 1.76 | 30 | 96.7% | 5 | 53 | 28/30 | 6.8 | |
| 16 |
|
TB | 17 | 52 | 1.71 | 1.82 | 31 | 93.5% | 7 | 57 | 33/33 | 7.1 | |
| 17 |
|
PIT | 17 | 43 | 1.71 | 1.82 | 31 | 93.5% | 6 | 57 | 27/28 | 6.7 | |
| 18 |
|
ARI | 17 | 40 | 1.65 | 1.94 | 33 | 84.8% | 9 | 62 | 22/23 | 6.2 | |
| 19 |
|
GB | 17 | 41 | 1.59 | 1.94 | 33 | 81.8% | 3 | 53 | 34/39 | 6.8 | |
| 20 |
|
HOU | 12 | 76 | 2.25 | 2.33 | 28 | 96.4% | 5 | 54 | 21/22 | 8.5 | |
| 21 |
|
LV | 17 | 37 | 1.53 | 1.76 | 30 | 86.7% | 1 | 54 | 32/32 | 6.5 | |
| 22 |
|
CIN | 17 | 48 | 1.53 | 1.82 | 31 | 83.9% | 7 | 56 | 40/40 | 6.9 | |
| 23 |
|
CAR | 15 | 35 | 1.67 | 1.93 | 29 | 86.2% | 5 | 56 | 17/20 | 6.1 | |
| 24 |
|
MIA | 17 | 56 | 1.41 | 1.65 | 28 | 85.7% | 5 | 57 | 58/59 | 7.6 | |
| 25 |
|
BUF | 17 | 48 | 1.41 | 1.71 | 29 | 82.8% | 4 | 54 | 49/50 | 7.1 | |
| 26 |
|
MIN | 17 | 38 | 1.41 | 1.76 | 30 | 80.0% | 4 | 54 | 36/38 | 6.4 | |
| 27 |
|
SF | 17 | 48 | 1.24 | 1.47 | 25 | 84.0% | 2 | 57 | 60/61 | 7.2 | |
| 28 |
|
WAS | 17 | 28 | 1.12 | 1.41 | 24 | 79.2% | 3 | 61 | 32/35 | 5.2 | |
| 29 |
|
LAR | 8 | 59 | 2.12 | 2.88 | 23 | 73.9% | 3 | 54 | 13/15 | 8.0 | |
| 30 |
|
NE | 17 | 17 | 0.94 | 1.47 | 25 | 64.0% | 2 | 56 | 24/25 | 4.2 | |
| 31 |
|
DET | 15 | 33 | 1.07 | 1.20 | 18 | 88.9% | 1 | 52 | 41/44 | 5.9 | |
| 32 |
|
LAR | 9 | 46 | 1.67 | 2.22 | 20 | 75.0% | 2 | 52 | 19/22 | 7.1 | |
| 33 |
|
NYG | 8 | 31 | 1.38 | 2.12 | 17 | 64.7% | 3 | 57 | 8/8 | 5.1 | |
| 34 |
|
HOU | 5 | — | 1.20 | 1.80 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 45 | 10/11 | 5.6 | |
| 35 |
|
NYG | 6 | 24 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 6 | 83.3% | 1 | 56 | 10/10 | 4.2 | |
| 36 |
|
DET | 4 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4 | 100.0% | 0 | 41 | 13/15 | 6.2 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2023, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.