Players 2018 final
Kickers — 2018 · ranked by FG made
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | FG/gm | Att/gm | FGM | FGA | FG% | 50+ | Long | PAT | Pts/gm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
HOU | 16 | 76 | 2.31 | 2.62 | 42 | 88.1% | 4 | 54 | 39/41 | 9.4 | |
| 2 |
|
BAL | 16 | 72 | 2.19 | 2.44 | 39 | 89.7% | 5 | 56 | 36/37 | 8.8 | |
| 3 |
|
NYJ | 16 | 65 | 2.06 | 2.25 | 36 | 91.7% | 6 | 56 | 30/33 | 8.1 | |
| 4 |
|
SF | 16 | 59 | 2.06 | 2.12 | 34 | 97.1% | 2 | 53 | 27/29 | 7.9 | |
| 5 |
|
NYG | 16 | 62 | 2.00 | 2.06 | 33 | 97.0% | 4 | 57 | 31/32 | 7.9 | |
| 6 |
|
GB | 16 | 60 | 1.88 | 2.31 | 37 | 81.1% | 5 | 53 | 34/36 | 7.8 | |
| 7 |
|
DAL | 16 | 58 | 1.81 | 2.25 | 36 | 80.6% | 6 | 62 | 32/33 | 7.4 | |
| 8 |
|
DET | 16 | 54 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 32 | 87.5% | 3 | 54 | 30/30 | 7.1 | |
| 9 |
|
NO | 16 | 67 | 1.75 | 1.88 | 30 | 93.3% | 2 | 54 | 52/53 | 8.5 | |
| 10 |
|
LAR | 11 | 83 | 2.45 | 2.82 | 31 | 87.1% | 4 | 56 | 35/36 | 10.5 | |
| 11 |
|
NE | 16 | 63 | 1.69 | 2.00 | 32 | 84.4% | 2 | 52 | 49/50 | 8.1 | |
| 12 |
|
WAS | 16 | 46 | 1.62 | 1.81 | 29 | 89.7% | 4 | 56 | 25/26 | 6.4 | |
| 13 |
|
TEN | 16 | 48 | 1.62 | 1.88 | 30 | 86.7% | 3 | 54 | 28/31 | 6.6 | |
| 14 |
|
PHI | 16 | 50 | 1.62 | 1.94 | 31 | 83.9% | 2 | 56 | 33/35 | 6.9 | |
| 15 |
|
KC | 16 | 69 | 1.50 | 1.69 | 27 | 88.9% | 2 | 54 | 65/69 | 8.6 | |
| 16 |
|
CHI | 16 | 49 | 1.44 | 1.88 | 30 | 76.7% | 1 | 50 | 42/45 | 6.9 | |
| 17 |
|
IND | 15 | 57 | 1.53 | 1.80 | 27 | 85.2% | 4 | 54 | 44/47 | 7.5 | |
| 18 |
|
SEA | 16 | 54 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 27 | 81.5% | 3 | 56 | 48/51 | 7.1 | |
| 19 |
|
BUF | 16 | 35 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 27 | 81.5% | 4 | 54 | 25/26 | 5.7 | |
| 20 |
|
MIN | 14 | 47 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 28 | 75.0% | 1 | 52 | 30/31 | 6.6 | |
| 21 |
|
ATL | 13 | 55 | 1.54 | 1.62 | 21 | 95.2% | 4 | 57 | 33/35 | 7.2 | |
| 22 |
|
DEN | 16 | 37 | 1.25 | 1.56 | 25 | 80.0% | 2 | 53 | 35/35 | 5.9 | |
| 23 |
|
CIN | 16 | 38 | 1.19 | 1.44 | 23 | 82.6% | 2 | 51 | 39/41 | 6.0 | |
| 24 |
|
JAX | 13 | 40 | 1.46 | 1.62 | 21 | 90.5% | 4 | 57 | 19/20 | 5.8 | |
| 25 |
|
MIA | 16 | 31 | 1.12 | 1.25 | 20 | 90.0% | 1 | 50 | 35/36 | 5.6 | |
| 26 |
|
CLE | 14 | 24 | 1.21 | 1.43 | 20 | 85.0% | 1 | 51 | 25/29 | 5.4 | |
| 27 |
|
MIN | 12 | 45 | 1.42 | 1.75 | 21 | 81.0% | 3 | 50 | 24/24 | 6.2 | |
| 28 |
|
TB | 13 | 41 | 1.23 | 1.54 | 20 | 80.0% | 3 | 59 | 30/35 | 6.0 | |
| 29 |
|
LAC | 10 | 52 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 16 | 93.8% | 1 | 59 | 27/28 | 7.2 | |
| 30 |
|
CAR | 12 | 42 | 1.17 | 1.33 | 16 | 87.5% | 3 | 63 | 30/33 | 6.0 | |
| 31 |
|
TB | 9 | 51 | 1.56 | 2.00 | 18 | 77.8% | 0 | 45 | 22/23 | 7.1 | |
| 32 |
|
PIT | 15 | 28 | 0.87 | 1.33 | 20 | 65.0% | 1 | 50 | 43/48 | 5.5 | |
| 33 |
|
LAC | 6 | 43 | 1.50 | 2.17 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 49 | 9/15 | 6.0 | |
| 34 |
|
CLE | 7 | 33 | 1.29 | 2.00 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 55 | 8/11 | 5.0 | |
| 35 |
|
PIT | 5 | — | 1.60 | 2.40 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 47 | 9/9 | 6.6 | |
| 36 |
|
ARI | 10 | 17 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 43 | 15/15 | 3.0 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2018, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.