BallKnowMe
More
NFL
1–1 · 50% · every call graded in public record →

Players 2018 final

Kickers — 2018 · ranked by FG made

#PlayerTmG Grade FG/gm Att/gm FGM FGA FG% 50+ Long PAT Pts/gm
1 Ka'imi Fairbairn HOU 16 76 2.31 2.62 37 42 88.1% 4 54 39/41 9.4
2 Justin Tucker BAL 16 72 2.19 2.44 35 39 89.7% 5 56 36/37 8.8
3 Jason Myers NYJ 16 65 2.06 2.25 33 36 91.7% 6 56 30/33 8.1
4 Robbie Gould SF 16 59 2.06 2.12 33 34 97.1% 2 53 27/29 7.9
5 Aldrick Rosas NYG 16 62 2.00 2.06 32 33 97.0% 4 57 31/32 7.9
6 Mason Crosby GB 16 60 1.88 2.31 30 37 81.1% 5 53 34/36 7.8
7 Brett Maher DAL 16 58 1.81 2.25 29 36 80.6% 6 62 32/33 7.4
8 Matt Prater DET 16 54 1.75 2.00 28 32 87.5% 3 54 30/30 7.1
9 Wil Lutz NO 16 67 1.75 1.88 28 30 93.3% 2 54 52/53 8.5
10 Greg Zuerlein LAR 11 83 2.45 2.82 27 31 87.1% 4 56 35/36 10.5
11 Stephen Gostkowski NE 16 63 1.69 2.00 27 32 84.4% 2 52 49/50 8.1
12 Dustin Hopkins WAS 16 46 1.62 1.81 26 29 89.7% 4 56 25/26 6.4
13 Ryan Succop TEN 16 48 1.62 1.88 26 30 86.7% 3 54 28/31 6.6
14 Jake Elliott PHI 16 50 1.62 1.94 26 31 83.9% 2 56 33/35 6.9
15 Harrison Butker KC 16 69 1.50 1.69 24 27 88.9% 2 54 65/69 8.6
16 Cody Parkey CHI 16 49 1.44 1.88 23 30 76.7% 1 50 42/45 6.9
17 Adam Vinatieri IND 15 57 1.53 1.80 23 27 85.2% 4 54 44/47 7.5
18 Sebastian Janikowski SEA 16 54 1.38 1.69 22 27 81.5% 3 56 48/51 7.1
19 Steven Hauschka BUF 16 35 1.38 1.69 22 27 81.5% 4 54 25/26 5.7
20 Dan Bailey MIN 14 47 1.50 2.00 21 28 75.0% 1 52 30/31 6.6
21 Matt Bryant ATL 13 55 1.54 1.62 20 21 95.2% 4 57 33/35 7.2
22 Brandon McManus DEN 16 37 1.25 1.56 20 25 80.0% 2 53 35/35 5.9
23 Randy Bullock CIN 16 38 1.19 1.44 19 23 82.6% 2 51 39/41 6.0
24 Josh Lambo JAX 13 40 1.46 1.62 19 21 90.5% 4 57 19/20 5.8
25 Jason Sanders MIA 16 31 1.12 1.25 18 20 90.0% 1 50 35/36 5.6
26 Greg Joseph CLE 14 24 1.21 1.43 17 20 85.0% 1 51 25/29 5.4
27 Daniel Carlson MIN 12 45 1.42 1.75 17 21 81.0% 3 50 24/24 6.2
28 Chandler Catanzaro TB 13 41 1.23 1.54 16 20 80.0% 3 59 30/35 6.0
29 Mike Badgley LAC 10 52 1.50 1.60 15 16 93.8% 1 59 27/28 7.2
30 Graham Gano CAR 12 42 1.17 1.33 14 16 87.5% 3 63 30/33 6.0
31 Cairo Santos TB 9 51 1.56 2.00 14 18 77.8% 0 45 22/23 7.1
32 Chris Boswell PIT 15 28 0.87 1.33 13 20 65.0% 1 50 43/48 5.5
33 Caleb Sturgis LAC 6 43 1.50 2.17 9 13 69.2% 0 49 9/15 6.0
34 Zane Gonzalez CLE 7 33 1.29 2.00 9 14 64.3% 2 55 8/11 5.0
35 Matt McCrane PIT 5 1.60 2.40 8 12 66.7% 0 47 9/9 6.6
36 Phil Dawson ARI 10 17 0.50 0.80 5 8 62.5% 0 43 15/15 3.0

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2018, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.