BallKnowMe
More
NFL
1–1 · 50% · every call graded in public record →

Players 2024 final

Quarterbacks — 2024 · ranked by Pass yards

#PlayerTmG Grade Yds/gm Att/gm Yds TD INT Cmp% Y/A Rush yds
1 Joe Burrow CIN 17 74 289.3 38.4 4918 43 9 70.6% 7.5 201
2 Jared Goff DET 17 70 272.3 31.7 4629 37 12 72.4% 8.6 56
3 Baker Mayfield TB 17 72 264.7 33.5 4500 41 16 71.4% 7.9 378
4 Geno Smith SEA 17 55 254.1 34.0 4320 21 15 70.4% 7.5 272
5 Sam Darnold MIN 17 65 254.1 32.1 4319 35 12 66.2% 7.9 212
6 Lamar Jackson BAL 17 85 245.4 27.9 4172 41 4 66.7% 8.8 915
7 Patrick Mahomes KC 16 60 245.5 36.3 3928 26 11 67.5% 6.8 307
8 Aaron Rodgers NYJ 17 54 229.2 34.4 3897 28 11 63.0% 6.7 107
9 Justin Herbert LAC 17 59 227.6 29.6 3870 23 3 65.9% 7.7 306
10 Brock Purdy SF 15 61 257.6 30.3 3864 20 12 65.9% 8.5 323
11 Kyler Murray ARI 17 63 226.5 31.8 3851 21 11 68.8% 7.1 572
12 Bo Nix DEN 17 58 222.1 33.4 3775 29 12 66.3% 6.7 430
13 Matthew Stafford LAR 16 53 235.1 32.3 3762 20 8 65.8% 7.3 41
14 Josh Allen BUF 16 78 233.2 30.2 3731 28 6 63.6% 7.7 531
15 C.J. Stroud HOU 17 47 219.2 31.3 3727 20 12 63.2% 7.0 233
16 Jayden Daniels WAS 17 68 209.9 28.2 3568 25 9 69.0% 7.4 891
17 Caleb Williams CHI 17 50 208.3 33.1 3541 20 6 62.5% 6.3 489
18 Kirk Cousins ATL 14 48 250.6 32.4 3508 18 16 66.9% 7.7 0
19 Jordan Love GB 15 58 225.9 28.3 3389 25 11 63.1% 8.0 83
20 Jalen Hurts PHI 15 66 193.5 24.1 2903 18 5 68.7% 8.0 630
21 Tua Tagovailoa MIA 11 64 260.6 36.3 2867 19 7 72.9% 7.2 49
22 Russell Wilson PIT 11 56 225.6 30.5 2482 16 5 63.7% 7.4 155
23 Bryce Young CAR 14 45 171.6 27.4 2403 15 9 60.9% 6.3 249
24 Drake Maye NE 13 48 175.1 26.0 2276 15 10 66.6% 6.7 421
25 Derek Carr NO 10 57 214.5 27.9 2145 15 5 67.7% 7.7 71
26 Jameis Winston CLE 11 40 192.8 26.9 2121 13 12 61.1% 7.2 83
27 Will Levis TEN 12 34 174.2 25.1 2091 13 12 63.1% 6.9 183
28 Daniel Jones NYG 10 46 207.0 34.1 2070 8 7 63.3% 6.1 265
29 Trevor Lawrence JAX 10 52 204.5 28.4 2045 11 7 60.6% 7.2 119
30 Gardner Minshew LV 10 32 201.3 30.6 2013 9 10 66.3% 6.6 58
31 Dak Prescott DAL 8 51 247.2 35.8 1978 11 8 64.7% 6.9 54
32 Cooper Rush DAL 12 36 153.7 25.7 1844 12 5 60.7% 6.0 18
33 Anthony Richardson IND 11 49 164.9 24.0 1814 8 12 47.7% 6.9 499
34 Joe Flacco IND 7 52 251.6 35.4 1761 12 7 65.3% 7.1 26
35 Mac Jones JAX 10 41 167.2 26.2 1672 8 8 65.3% 6.4 92
36 Aidan O'Connell LV 9 42 179.1 27.0 1612 8 4 63.4% 6.6 30
37 Mason Rudolph TEN 8 42 191.2 28.5 1530 9 9 64.0% 6.7 106
38 Spencer Rattler NO 7 30 188.1 32.6 1317 4 5 57.0% 5.8 146
39 Deshaun Watson CLE 7 35 164.0 30.9 1148 5 3 63.4% 5.3 148
40 Justin Fields PIT 10 44 110.6 16.1 1106 5 1 65.8% 6.9 289
41 Drew Lock NYG 7 37 153.0 25.9 1071 6 5 59.1% 5.9 133
42 Andy Dalton CAR 6 39 164.8 26.7 989 7 6 66.2% 6.2 34
43 Tyler Huntley MIA 5 165.8 26.6 829 3 3 64.7% 6.2 135
44 Jacoby Brissett NE 7 28 118.0 23.0 826 2 1 59.0% 5.1 62
45 Michael Penix Jr. ATL 5 155.0 21.0 775 3 3 58.1% 7.4 11
46 Malik Willis GB 6 43 91.7 9.0 550 3 0 74.1% 10.2 138
47 Desmond Ridder LV 5 91.6 17.0 458 2 2 61.2% 5.4 36
48 Dorian Thompson-Robinson CLE 6 15 73.3 19.7 440 0 6 51.7% 3.7 122
49 Kenny Pickett PHI 5 58.2 8.4 291 2 1 59.5% 6.9 15
50 Trey Lance DAL 4 66.5 10.2 266 0 1 61.0% 6.5 41
51 Jake Haener NO 8 22 28.2 4.9 226 1 1 46.2% 5.8 22
52 Davis Mills HOU 4 53.0 9.0 212 0 0 55.6% 5.9 11
53 Mitchell Trubisky BUF 8 26 22.4 3.2 179 2 0 73.1% 6.9 1
54 Nick Mullens MIN 4 9.5 0.5 38 0 0 100.0% 19.0 -2
55 Taylor Heinicke LAC 4 7.0 1.2 28 0 0 60.0% 5.6 20
56 Josh Johnson BAL 4 4.2 0.8 17 0 0 66.7% 5.7 1
57 Tyson Bagent CHI 4 2.8 0.5 11 0 0 100.0% 5.5 -7
58 Clayton Tune ARI 5 1.6 0.4 8 0 0 100.0% 4.0 -4

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2024, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.