Players 2018 final

1

Ben Roethlisberger

PIT· 16 G

5129 Pass yards

2

Patrick Mahomes

KC· 16 G

5097 Pass yards

3

Matt Ryan

ATL· 16 G

4924 Pass yards

4

Jared Goff

LAR· 16 G

4688 Pass yards

5

Andrew Luck

IND· 16 G

4593 Pass yards

Quarterbacks — 2018 · ranked by Pass yards

#	Player	Tm	G	Grade	Yds/gm	Att/gm	Yds	TD	INT	Cmp%	Y/A	Rush yds
1	Ben Roethlisberger	PIT	16	72	320.6	42.2	5129	34	16	67.0%	7.6	98
2	Patrick Mahomes	KC	16	83	318.6	36.2	5097	50	12	66.0%	8.8	272
3	Matt Ryan	ATL	16	76	307.8	38.0	4924	35	7	69.4%	8.1	125
4	Jared Goff	LAR	16	66	293.0	35.1	4688	32	12	64.9%	8.4	108
5	Andrew Luck	IND	16	70	287.1	39.9	4593	39	15	67.3%	7.2	148
6	Aaron Rodgers	GB	16	61	277.6	37.3	4442	25	2	62.3%	7.4	269
7	Tom Brady	NE	16	56	272.2	35.6	4355	29	11	65.8%	7.6	35
8	Philip Rivers	LAC	16	62	269.2	31.8	4308	32	12	68.3%	8.5	7
9	Eli Manning	NYG	16	46	268.7	36.0	4299	21	11	66.0%	7.5	20
10	Kirk Cousins	MIN	16	51	268.6	37.9	4298	30	10	70.1%	7.1	123
11	Deshaun Watson	HOU	16	64	260.3	31.6	4165	26	9	68.3%	8.2	551
12	Derek Carr	LV	16	41	253.1	34.6	4049	19	10	68.9%	7.3	47
13	Drew Brees	NO	15	68	266.1	32.6	3992	32	5	74.4%	8.2	22
14	Case Keenum	DEN	16	36	243.1	36.6	3890	18	15	62.3%	6.6	93
15	Dak Prescott	DAL	16	52	242.8	32.9	3885	22	8	67.7%	7.4	305
16	Matthew Stafford	DET	16	44	236.1	34.7	3777	21	11	66.1%	6.8	71
17	Baker Mayfield	CLE	14	50	266.1	34.7	3725	27	14	63.8%	7.7	131
18	Russell Wilson	SEA	16	60	215.5	26.7	3448	35	7	65.6%	8.1	376
19	Cam Newton	CAR	14	54	242.5	33.6	3395	24	13	67.9%	7.2	488
20	Mitchell Trubisky	CHI	14	55	230.2	31.0	3223	24	12	66.6%	7.4	421
21	Carson Wentz	PHI	11	57	279.5	36.5	3074	21	7	69.6%	7.7	93
22	Jameis Winston	TB	11	53	272.0	34.4	2992	19	14	64.6%	7.9	281
23	Sam Darnold	NYJ	13	40	220.4	31.8	2865	17	15	57.7%	6.9	135
24	Blake Bortles	JAX	13	38	209.1	31.0	2718	13	11	60.3%	6.7	365
25	Andy Dalton	CIN	11	49	233.3	33.2	2566	21	11	61.9%	7.0	99
26	Marcus Mariota	TEN	14	39	180.6	23.6	2528	11	8	68.9%	7.6	357
27	Joe Flacco	BAL	9	47	273.9	42.1	2465	12	6	61.2%	6.5	45
28	Ryan Fitzpatrick	TB	8	59	295.8	30.8	2366	17	12	66.7%	9.6	152
29	Josh Rosen	ARI	14	17	162.7	28.1	2278	11	14	55.2%	5.8	138
30	Nick Mullens	SF	8	48	284.6	34.2	2277	13	10	64.2%	8.3	-16
31	Alex Smith	WAS	10	43	218.0	32.8	2180	10	5	62.5%	6.6	168
32	Josh Allen	BUF	12	45	170.3	26.6	2044	10	12	52.7%	6.4	631
33	Ryan Tannehill	MIA	11	34	179.9	24.9	1979	17	9	64.2%	7.2	145
34	Nick Foles	PHI	5	—	282.6	39.0	1413	7	4	72.3%	7.2	17
35	C.J. Beathard	SF	5	—	250.4	33.8	1252	8	7	60.4%	7.4	69
36	Brock Osweiler	MIA	7	32	178.1	25.4	1247	6	4	63.5%	7.0	21
37	Lamar Jackson	BAL	16	28	75.1	10.6	1201	6	3	58.2%	7.1	695
38	Jeff Driskel	CIN	8	30	125.4	22.0	1003	6	2	59.7%	5.7	130
39	Cody Kessler	JAX	5	—	141.8	26.2	709	2	2	64.9%	5.4	123
40	Blaine Gabbert	TEN	8	24	78.2	12.6	626	4	4	60.4%	6.2	0
41	Josh Johnson	WAS	4	—	147.5	22.8	590	3	4	57.1%	6.5	120
42	Josh McCown	NYJ	4	—	134.8	27.5	539	1	4	54.5%	4.9	32
43	Chase Daniel	CHI	4	—	128.8	19.0	515	3	2	69.7%	6.8	3
44	Tyrod Taylor	CLE	4	—	118.2	21.2	473	2	2	49.4%	5.6	125
45	Taylor Heinicke	CAR	5	—	64.0	11.4	320	1	3	61.4%	5.6	31
46	Nathan Peterman	BUF	4	—	74.0	20.2	296	1	7	54.3%	3.7	50
47	Teddy Bridgewater	NO	4	—	29.5	5.8	118	1	1	60.9%	5.1	5
48	Joshua Dobbs	PIT	5	—	8.6	2.4	43	0	1	50.0%	3.6	11
49	Geno Smith	LAC	4	—	2.0	1.0	8	0	0	25.0%	2.0	2
50	Brian Hoyer	NE	5	—	1.4	0.4	7	0	0	50.0%	3.5	-8
51	Jacoby Brissett	IND	4	—	0.5	1.0	2	0	0	50.0%	0.5	-7
52	Joe Webb	HOU	4	—	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	—	0

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2018, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.