Players 2020 final
Quarterbacks — 2020 · ranked by Pass yards
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Yds/gm | Att/gm | Yds | TD | INT | Cmp% | Y/A | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
HOU | 16 | 70 | 301.4 | 34.0 | 33 | 7 | 70.2% | 8.9 | 444 | |
| 2 |
|
KC | 15 | 84 | 316.0 | 39.2 | 38 | 6 | 66.3% | 8.1 | 308 | |
| 3 |
|
TB | 16 | 66 | 289.6 | 38.1 | 40 | 12 | 65.7% | 7.6 | 6 | |
| 4 |
|
ATL | 16 | 54 | 286.3 | 39.1 | 26 | 11 | 65.0% | 7.3 | 92 | |
| 5 |
|
BUF | 16 | 77 | 284.0 | 35.8 | 37 | 10 | 69.2% | 7.9 | 421 | |
| 6 |
|
LAC | 15 | 61 | 289.1 | 39.7 | 31 | 10 | 66.6% | 7.3 | 234 | |
| 7 |
|
GB | 16 | 73 | 268.7 | 32.9 | 48 | 5 | 70.7% | 8.2 | 149 | |
| 8 |
|
MIN | 16 | 60 | 266.6 | 32.2 | 35 | 13 | 67.6% | 8.3 | 156 | |
| 9 |
|
SEA | 16 | 68 | 263.2 | 34.9 | 40 | 13 | 68.8% | 7.5 | 513 | |
| 10 |
|
IND | 16 | 50 | 260.6 | 33.9 | 24 | 11 | 68.0% | 7.7 | -8 | |
| 11 |
|
LV | 16 | 56 | 256.4 | 32.3 | 27 | 9 | 67.3% | 7.9 | 140 | |
| 12 |
|
DET | 16 | 51 | 255.2 | 33.0 | 26 | 10 | 64.2% | 7.7 | 112 | |
| 13 |
|
ARI | 16 | 62 | 248.2 | 34.9 | 26 | 12 | 67.2% | 7.1 | 819 | |
| 14 |
|
LAR | 15 | 49 | 263.5 | 36.8 | 20 | 13 | 67.0% | 7.2 | 99 | |
| 15 |
|
TEN | 16 | 65 | 238.7 | 30.1 | 33 | 7 | 65.5% | 7.9 | 266 | |
| 16 |
|
PIT | 15 | 57 | 253.5 | 40.5 | 33 | 10 | 65.6% | 6.3 | 11 | |
| 17 |
|
CAR | 15 | 48 | 248.9 | 32.8 | 15 | 11 | 69.1% | 7.6 | 279 | |
| 18 |
|
CLE | 16 | 53 | 222.7 | 30.4 | 26 | 8 | 62.8% | 7.3 | 165 | |
| 19 |
|
NYG | 14 | 44 | 210.2 | 32.0 | 11 | 10 | 62.5% | 6.6 | 423 | |
| 20 |
|
NO | 12 | 58 | 245.2 | 32.5 | 24 | 6 | 70.5% | 7.5 | -2 | |
| 21 |
|
DEN | 13 | 37 | 225.6 | 34.1 | 16 | 15 | 57.3% | 6.6 | 160 | |
| 22 |
|
BAL | 15 | 63 | 183.8 | 25.1 | 26 | 9 | 64.4% | 7.3 | 1005 | |
| 23 |
|
CIN | 10 | 55 | 268.8 | 40.4 | 13 | 5 | 65.3% | 6.7 | 142 | |
| 24 |
|
NE | 15 | 45 | 177.1 | 24.5 | 8 | 10 | 65.8% | 7.2 | 592 | |
| 25 |
|
PHI | 12 | 39 | 218.3 | 36.4 | 16 | 15 | 57.4% | 6.0 | 276 | |
| 26 |
|
SF | 10 | 40 | 243.7 | 32.6 | 12 | 12 | 64.7% | 7.5 | 8 | |
| 27 |
|
JAX | 9 | 52 | 251.0 | 36.3 | 16 | 5 | 66.1% | 6.9 | 153 | |
| 28 |
|
NYJ | 12 | 32 | 184.0 | 30.3 | 9 | 11 | 59.6% | 6.1 | 217 | |
| 29 |
|
DAL | 11 | 42 | 197.3 | 30.3 | 14 | 8 | 64.9% | 6.5 | 114 | |
| 30 |
|
MIA | 9 | 50 | 232.3 | 29.7 | 13 | 8 | 68.5% | 7.8 | 151 | |
| 31 |
|
CHI | 10 | 47 | 205.5 | 29.7 | 16 | 8 | 67.0% | 6.9 | 195 | |
| 32 |
|
DAL | 5 | — | 371.2 | 44.4 | 9 | 4 | 68.0% | 8.4 | 93 | |
| 33 |
|
CHI | 9 | 35 | 205.8 | 34.7 | 10 | 8 | 64.7% | 5.9 | 1 | |
| 34 |
|
MIA | 10 | 43 | 181.4 | 29.0 | 11 | 5 | 64.1% | 6.3 | 109 | |
| 35 |
|
WAS | 8 | 30 | 197.8 | 31.5 | 6 | 8 | 66.7% | 6.3 | 3 | |
| 36 |
|
WAS | 7 | 34 | 205.6 | 34.4 | 5 | 7 | 61.4% | 6.0 | 46 | |
| 37 |
|
SF | 6 | 46 | 182.7 | 23.3 | 7 | 5 | 67.1% | 7.8 | 25 | |
| 38 |
|
JAX | 5 | — | 214.4 | 35.8 | 7 | 5 | 62.0% | 6.0 | 17 | |
| 39 |
|
PHI | 14 | 27 | 75.8 | 10.6 | 6 | 4 | 52.0% | 7.2 | 354 | |
| 40 |
|
CIN | 5 | — | 185.0 | 28.4 | 5 | 4 | 63.4% | 6.5 | 27 | |
| 41 |
|
NYJ | 5 | — | 172.8 | 26.8 | 6 | 3 | 55.2% | 6.4 | 22 | |
| 42 |
|
SF | 6 | 38 | 131.2 | 17.3 | 6 | 0 | 63.5% | 7.6 | 28 | |
| 43 |
|
WAS | 4 | — | 152.5 | 21.8 | 4 | 1 | 69.0% | 7.0 | 26 | |
| 44 |
|
NYG | 4 | — | 93.8 | 16.5 | 1 | 1 | 60.6% | 5.7 | 12 | |
| 45 |
|
CAR | 4 | — | 92.0 | 14.0 | 1 | 5 | 57.1% | 6.6 | -2 | |
| 46 |
|
PIT | 4 | — | 81.0 | 10.8 | 2 | 1 | 58.1% | 7.5 | -6 | |
| 47 |
|
DET | 4 | — | 66.0 | 10.8 | 1 | 2 | 67.4% | 6.1 | 16 | |
| 48 |
|
NE | 5 | — | 51.2 | 8.8 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% | 5.8 | 7 | |
| 49 |
|
BUF | 4 | — | 49.2 | 5.2 | 1 | 1 | 52.4% | 9.4 | -6 | |
| 50 |
|
CIN | 4 | — | 41.0 | 8.0 | 1 | 2 | 53.1% | 5.1 | 66 | |
| 51 |
|
TB | 4 | — | 35.8 | 4.0 | 2 | 0 | 56.2% | 8.9 | 16 | |
| 52 |
|
BAL | 4 | — | 10.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 2 | 57.1% | 3.0 | 69 | |
| 53 |
|
IND | 11 | 16 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% | 2.1 | 19 | |
| 54 |
|
TEN | 5 | — | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% | 2.3 | 10 | |
| 55 |
|
GB | 8 | 23 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | -9 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2020, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.