Player ratings 2026 season

Pos rankPlayerPos School Grade G2026 season
#2 Luke Yoder RB Lehigh FCS 96 3 419 rush yds · 9 TD · 3 rec
#3 Tylan Hines RB Tarleton State FCS 94 3 575 rush yds · 4 TD · 6 rec
#4 Eli Gillman RB Montana FCS 92 3 328 rush yds · 7 TD · 5 rec
#6 Floyd Chalk RB Southern Utah FCS 90 3 427 rush yds · 6 TD · 4 rec
#11 Mason Pickett-Hicks RB South Carolina State FCS 86 3 417 rush yds · 3 TD · 6 rec
#14 Charles Kellom RB Eastern Illinois FCS 85 3 297 rush yds · 4 TD · 9 rec
#15 Danny Shaban RB Colgate FCS 84 3 395 rush yds · 3 TD · 7 rec
#21 Gavin Garcia RB The Citadel FCS 82 3 289 rush yds · 4 TD · 2 rec
#25 Omiri Wiggins RB McNeese FCS 81 3 217 rush yds · 2 TD · 9 rec
#26 Gerald Modest Jr. RB Wofford FCS 81 3 246 rush yds · 4 TD · 6 rec
#27 Charles Pierre Jr. RB South Dakota FCS 81 3 261 rush yds · 4 TD · 2 rec
#30 CJ Hester RB Stony Brook FCS 80 3 271 rush yds · 3 TD · 5 rec
#35 Tommy Ansley RB UT Martin FCS 79 3 188 rush yds · 5 TD · 4 rec
#39 Jordan Fisher RB UC Davis FCS 78 3 148 rush yds · 3 TD · 9 rec
#40 Adam Jones RB Montana State FCS 78 3 198 rush yds · 3 TD · 6 rec
#41 Kenny Smith Jr. RB Monmouth FCS 78 3 166 rush yds · 2 TD · 8 rec
#42 TJ Peyton RB East Tennessee State FCS 78 3 253 rush yds · 3 TD · 3 rec
#44 Jaden Gilbert RB Youngstown State FCS 78 3 129 rush yds · 2 TD · 8 rec
#51 Kevin Lalin RB Chattanooga FCS 77 3 290 rush yds · 2 TD · 5 rec
#60 Lontrell Turner RB Incarnate Word FCS 76 2 153 rush yds · 3 TD · 1 rec
#62 Brady Hensley RB Eastern Kentucky FCS 75 3 225 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec
#63 Athean Renfro Jr. RB Texas Southern FCS 75 3 293 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec
#65 Elijah Jennings RB Monmouth FCS 75 3 217 rush yds · 1 TD · 4 rec
#68 Aziz Foster-Powell RB Richmond FCS 75 3 141 rush yds · 3 TD · 4 rec
#71 Kamerin McDowell-Moore RB Elon FCS 74 3 280 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec
#72 Chase Bingmon RB Prairie View A&M FCS 74 3 103 rush yds · 2 TD · 10 rec
#74 Jaylen Jenkins RB Stephen F. Austin FCS 74 3 234 rush yds · 2 TD · 4 rec
#77 Quran Gossett RB Northern Arizona FCS 74 3 228 rush yds · 2 TD · 6 rec
#78 Ernest Temple RB Alcorn State FCS 74 3 187 rush yds · 2 TD · 7 rec
#82 Joquez Smith RB New Hampshire FCS 73 3 208 rush yds · 3 TD
#86 Michael Cadden RB Bucknell FCS 73 3 131 rush yds · 1 TD · 12 rec
#87 Josh Shaw RB South Carolina State FCS 73 3 108 rush yds · 6 TD
#88 Charles Langama RB North Dakota FCS 73 3 254 rush yds · 2 TD · 2 rec
#91 James Basinger RB South Dakota State FCS 72 2 198 rush yds · 3 TD
#92 Plez Lawrence RB North Carolina Central FCS 72 3 264 rush yds · 3 TD · 1 rec
#95 Joey Koch RB UAlbany FCS 72 3 216 rush yds · 1 TD · 5 rec
#96 Ja'briel Mace RB Villanova FCS 72 3 147 rush yds · 1 TD · 4 rec
#97 Jalen Washington RB Central Arkansas FCS 72 3 253 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec
#100 Andrew King RB William & Mary FCS 72 3 196 rush yds · 2 TD · 5 rec
#107 Josiah Johnson RB South Dakota State FCS 71 3 190 rush yds · 3 TD
#108 Tyrell Campbell RB Murray State FCS 71 3 213 rush yds · 1 TD · 7 rec
#111 Jamarie Hostzclaw RB Alabama State FCS 71 3 169 rush yds · 3 TD · 4 rec
#113 Chris Franklin RB UT Martin FCS 71 3 193 rush yds · 2 TD · 5 rec
#118 Jaden Green RB Cal Poly FCS 70 3 217 rush yds · 5 rec
#119 Qua Ashley RB Tennessee Tech FCS 70 3 120 rush yds · 1 TD · 4 rec
#120 Byron Eaton Jr. RB Grambling FCS 70 3 79 rush yds · 1 TD · 5 rec
#122 Matt Lawson RB North Dakota FCS 70 3 155 rush yds · 3 TD · 4 rec
#123 Isaiah Ragland RB Villanova FCS 70 3 170 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec
#125 Nate Blount IV RB Jackson State FCS 70 2 168 rush yds · 2 TD · 2 rec
#126 Jimmyll Williams RB Elon FCS 70 3 122 rush yds · 4 TD · 2 rec

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.

Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.