Player ratings 2026 season
| Pos rank | Player | Pos | School | Grade | G | 2026 season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | Khalid Bueno | DL |
|
99 | 3 | 21 tkl · 4.5 sacks · 8.5 TFL |
| #12 | Zarion Walters | DL |
|
90 | 3 | 17 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 6.0 TFL |
| #14 | Trehsyn Fesili | DL |
|
90 | 3 | 20 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #15 | Ibrahim Sanogo | DL |
|
89 | 2 | 11 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 5.5 TFL |
| #20 | Avery Howard | DL |
|
88 | 3 | 17 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL |
| #24 | Chris Bacon | DL |
|
87 | 3 | 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #28 | Jeremiah Young | DL |
|
86 | 2 | 7 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #29 | Cayden Adkins | DL |
|
86 | 3 | 11 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #30 | Asher Wilson | DL |
|
86 | 3 | 14 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL |
| #32 | Camden Byrd | DL |
|
85 | 3 | 7 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #37 | Nathaniel McDonald | DL |
|
84 | 3 | 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #40 | Ben Voigtlaender | DL |
|
84 | 3 | 14 tkl · 2.5 TFL |
| #44 | Collin Lewis | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 10 tkl · 0.5 TFL |
| #46 | Hudson Tucker | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 10 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #48 | Shawan Lewis | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 10 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL |
| #50 | Jordan Dollard | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 11 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 5.5 TFL |
| #53 | RJ Staten | DL |
|
82 | 2 | 11 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #54 | Kylon Roberts | DL |
|
82 | 3 | 17 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #55 | Demoris Jenkins | DL |
|
82 | 3 | 8 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 1.5 TFL |
| #65 | Kaleb Harris | DL |
|
81 | 3 | 12 tkl · 3.5 TFL |
| #67 | Jayden Walker | DL |
|
81 | 3 | 18 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #70 | Donovan Moyer | DL |
|
80 | 3 | 11 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #72 | Timothy Maxson | DL |
|
80 | 3 | 12 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #75 | Derick Simon Jr. | DL |
|
80 | 3 | 19 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 2.5 TFL |
| #76 | Hudson Page | DL |
|
80 | 3 | 15 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #77 | Tyson Shivers | DL |
|
80 | 2 | 10 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #78 | Chris Wilson | DL |
|
80 | 3 | 14 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #82 | Ugo Nwotite | DL |
|
80 | 3 | 6 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #85 | Jaden Few | DL |
|
79 | 3 | 13 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.5 TFL |
| #86 | Duncan Parham | DL |
|
79 | 3 | 12 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #88 | Daniel Sellers | DL |
|
79 | 3 | 7 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #90 | Kortlin Rausaw | DL |
|
79 | 3 | 21 tkl · 1.0 TFL |
| #101 | Ka Von Chisolm | DL |
|
78 | 3 | 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 5.5 TFL |
| #102 | Alex Villavaso | DL |
|
78 | 3 | 9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #103 | Myles Amey | DL |
|
78 | 3 | 9 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 3.5 TFL |
| #107 | Case Mankins | DL |
|
78 | 2 | 6 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #106 | Jordan Pigram | DL |
|
78 | 3 | 8 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #112 | Aiden Hall | DL |
|
78 | 3 | 6 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 2.5 TFL |
| #113 | Arenza Davis | DL |
|
77 | 3 | 12 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.5 TFL |
| #114 | Brody Thornton | DL |
|
77 | 3 | 8 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #115 | Jordan Caldwell | DL |
|
77 | 1 | 1 tkl |
| #119 | Ckelby Givens | DL |
|
77 | 2 | 6 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #120 | Jayden Fuller | DL |
|
77 | 2 | 6 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #122 | Dominic Butts | DL |
|
77 | 3 | 10 tkl · 4.0 TFL |
| #124 | Justin Garza | DL |
|
77 | 2 | 7 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #126 | Christian Sampson | DL |
|
77 | 3 | 13 tkl · 1.5 TFL |
| #125 | Lorenzo Riddick | DL |
|
77 | 3 | 9 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #129 | Jakobe Shell | DL |
|
76 | 3 | 9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.5 TFL |
| #133 | Kelton McCaslin | DL |
|
76 | 2 | 6 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 3.5 TFL |
| #134 | Jyheam Ingram | DL |
|
76 | 3 | 12 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.
What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.
Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.