← Matchups

Chicago State

· 1-2 · power -12.5 · #323
Our numberCHIC -11.5 no book has priced this game

North Carolina A&T

· 0-3 · power -23.7 · #387
Our side
MoneylineCHIC to win ours 24%
Projected score 35–23 CHIC – NCAT
2026-10-17 · 12:00 PM Truist Stadium · Greensboro, NC Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

First recorded meeting between these programs
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
North Carolina A&T Aggies Balanced · 57% run Ball-control

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all D1 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Chicago State Cougars
DL Jayden Earley 12 tkl · 1.5 TFL #6 DL
DL Lesroy Tittle 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL #7 DL
DL Tehron Spencer 14 tkl · 2.0 TFL #38 DL
DL Armani Itote 11 tkl · 2.0 TFL #108 DL
North Carolina A&T Aggies
TE Anthony Rucker 7 rec · 115 yds · 2 TD #29 TE
DB Mykell Harvey 16 tkl · 2 PD #183 DB
WR Elijah Kennedy 13 rec · 152 yds · 2 TD #148 WR
DL Eddie Conover 8 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 3.0 TFL #336 DL

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Chicago State Cougars -12.5 -4.2 -8.3 #323
North Carolina A&T Aggies -23.7 -12.0 -11.7 #387

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Chicago State offense vs North Carolina A&T defense+7.6 pts
North Carolina A&T offense vs Chicago State defense-3.7 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness-2.6 pts
Power projection before adjustment-8.9
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 583 mi
Rest · context onlyAway team on 7 more days rest

The projection carries an efficiency adjustment — a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.