← Matchups

Akron

MAC · 1-1 · power +2.3 · #149
Our side · spreadAKR +27.5 our number MINN -6.0 · 21.5 pts from the market our number starts from the opening line and is corrected -0.3 for this matchup by our data on both teams

Minnesota

B1G · 1-1 · power +6.8 · #104
Our side
SpreadAKR +27.5 ours MINN -6.0
TotalUnder 49.5 ours 49.5
MoneylineMINN to win ours 64% · book 96%
Distance from the market 21.5 pts / +0.0 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 22–28 AKR – MINN
2026-09-19 · 12:00 PM Huntington Bank Stadium · Minneapolis, MN Early season

The books 1 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book AKR spreadMINN spread OverUnder AKR winMINN win AKR TT overAKR TT under MINN TT overMINN TT under
FanDuel

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadMinnesota -6.0
the marketMinnesota -27.5
Total49.5
the market49.5
Minnesota win64% vs 96%

Both percentages are Minnesota’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

First recorded meeting between these programs
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge Minnesota Golden Gophers 98 ranks
Akron Zips #215 rush offense Minnesota Golden Gophers #117 run defense
Pass game edge Minnesota Golden Gophers 121 ranks
Akron Zips #201 pass offense Minnesota Golden Gophers #80 pass defense
Run game edge Akron Zips 162 ranks
Minnesota Golden Gophers #224 rush offense Akron Zips #62 run defense
Pass game even 7 ranks apart
Minnesota Golden Gophers #129 pass offense Akron Zips #122 pass defense
Akron Zips Balanced · 50% run Ball-control Minnesota Golden Gophers Balanced · 44% run Ball-control
Joe Moorhead · 27-47 · defense-minded P.J. Fleck · 87-50

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Akron Zips
TE Elijah Alexander 7 rec · 61 yds · 3 TD #9 TE
QB Cibastian Broughton 338 pass yds · 4 TD · 0 INT #17 QB
DL Omari Abor 8 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #84 DL
RB Sean Patrick 100 rush yds · 6 rec #134 RB
Minnesota Golden Gophers
DL TJ Bush Jr. 11 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #92 DL
RB Darius Taylor 71 rush yds · 3 TD · 4 rec #139 RB
LB Maverick Baranowski 15 tkl · 1.0 TFL #208 LB
QB Drake Lindsey 543 pass yds · 1 TD · 0 INT #77 QB

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Akron ZipsMAC +2.3 +1.9 +0.4 #149
Minnesota Golden GophersB1G +6.8 +1.1 +5.6 #104

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Akron offense vs Minnesota defense-3.7 pts
Minnesota offense vs Akron defense+0.7 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 650 mi

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.