← Matchups

Penn State

B1G · 2-0 · power +28.5 · #9
Our side · spreadPSU -23.5 logged our number at the pick PSU -24.6 · now PSU -18.1 · 5.9 pts from the market now

Temple

AAC · 1-1 · power +8.3 · #92
Final PSU 27 · TEM 9 ML W Spread L Total L our logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
SpreadPSU -23.5 logged live now: TEM +24 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours PSU -18.1

The line has not moved a point since it opened (TEM +23.5 → +23.5), so our number decides: PSU by 24.6 against TEM +23.5 means PSU covers.

TotalOver 49.5 logged live now: Over 50.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours 51.5

The total has not moved a point since it opened (49.5 → 49.5); ours 50.6 against 49.5 says over.

MoneylinePSU to win logged ours 16% · book 6%

Our number: PSU by 24.6 — PSU to win.

PSU team totalPSU over 36.5 logged ours 34.8

Our number: PSU 37.6, from our margin and total split into two scores.

TEM team totalTEM over 12.5 logged ours 16.7

Our number: TEM 13.0, from our margin and total split into two scores.

Distance from the market 5.9 pts / +1.0 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 35–17 PSU – TEM
2026-09-12 · 12:00 PM Lincoln Financial Field · Philadelphia, PA Early season

The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book PSU spreadTEM spread OverUnder PSU winTEM win PSU TT overPSU TT under TEM TT overTEM TT under
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadPenn State -18.1
the marketTemple +24.0
Total51.5
the market50.5
Temple win16% vs 6%

Both percentages are Temple’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Network captured in-game spread TEM 76% bets · 18% money · money PSU total Under 58% bets · 51% money ML PSU 97% bets · 94% money
Series Penn State lead 40–4–1 · 45 meetings since 1931
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge Penn State Nittany Lions 200 ranks
Penn State Nittany Lions #35 rush offense Temple Owls #235 run defense
Pass game edge Penn State Nittany Lions 139 ranks
Penn State Nittany Lions #96 pass offense Temple Owls #235 pass defense
Run game even 34 ranks apart
Temple Owls #149 rush offense Penn State Nittany Lions #115 run defense
Pass game even 9 ranks apart
Temple Owls #59 pass offense Penn State Nittany Lions #50 pass defense
Penn State Nittany Lions Run-heavy · 59% run Ball-control Temple Owls Balanced · 57% run Ball-control
Terry Smith · 4-3 K.C. Keeler · 17-19 · offense-minded

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Penn State Nittany Lions
TE Benjamin Brahmer 6 rec · 87 yds · 3 TD #4 TE
LB Tony Rojas 14 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #48 LB
WR Koby Howard 9 rec · 229 yds · 1 TD #71 WR
QB Rocco Becht 539 pass yds · 7 TD · 0 INT #30 QB
Temple Owls
RB Keveun Mason 234 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec #24 RB
DB Jamarcus Pierre 3 tkl · 1 PD · 1 INT #107 DB
LB Curly Ordonez 20 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL #68 LB
LB Tyree Alualu 5 tkl #81 LB

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Penn State Nittany LionsB1G +28.5 +10.4 +18.1 #9
Temple OwlsAAC +8.3 +3.6 +4.7 #92

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Penn State offense vs Temple defense+5.7 pts
Temple offense vs Penn State defense-14.5 pts
Altitude · context only351 m lower than the visitor's home elevation

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.