← Matchups

NC State

ACC · 1-1 (0-1 ACC) · power +13.8 · #62
Our side · spreadVAN -5.5 our number VAN -9.5 · 4.0 pts from the market our number starts from the opening line and is corrected -0.3 for this matchup by our data on both teams

Vanderbilt

SEC · 2-0 · power +21.8 · #28
Our side
SpreadVAN -5.5 ours VAN -9.5
TotalOver 52.5 ours 53.5
MoneylineVAN to win ours 71% · book 63%
Distance from the market 4.0 pts / +1.0 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 22–32 NCSU – VAN
2026-09-19 · 12:45 PM FirstBank Stadium · Nashville, TN Early season

The books 1 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book NCSU spreadVAN spread OverUnder NCSU winVAN win NCSU TT overNCSU TT under VAN TT overVAN TT under
FanDuel

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadVanderbilt -9.5
the marketVanderbilt -5.5
Total53.5
the market52.5
Vanderbilt win71% vs 63%

Both percentages are Vanderbilt’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Series Vanderbilt lead 2–1 · 3 meetings since 1946
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game even 18 ranks apart
NC State Wolfpack #32 rush offense Vanderbilt Commodores #50 run defense
Pass game edge NC State Wolfpack 138 ranks
NC State Wolfpack #56 pass offense Vanderbilt Commodores #194 pass defense
Run game edge Vanderbilt Commodores 122 ranks
Vanderbilt Commodores #4 rush offense NC State Wolfpack #126 run defense
Pass game edge Vanderbilt Commodores 133 ranks
Vanderbilt Commodores #6 pass offense NC State Wolfpack #139 pass defense
NC State Wolfpack Balanced · 51% run Ball-control Vanderbilt Commodores Balanced · 51% run Ball-control Dual-threat QB · 69 rush ypg
Dave Doeren · 84-56 · offense-minded Clark Lea · 26-36 · offense-minded

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
NC State Wolfpack
LB Popo Aguirre 21 tkl #147 LB
TE Preston Douglas 5 rec · 71 yds · 1 TD #52 TE
RB Jayden Scott 148 rush yds · 2 TD #149 RB
DB Ronnie Royal III 9 tkl · 1 PD #499 DB
Vanderbilt Commodores
LB Nick Rinaldi 13 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL #7 LB
DB CJ Heard 14 tkl · 1 PD #21 DB
DL Miles Capers 9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL #23 DL
DL Issa Ouattara 6 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #139 DL

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
NC State WolfpackACC +13.8 +9.2 +4.6 #62
Vanderbilt CommodoresSEC +21.8 +11.2 +10.6 #28

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
NC State offense vs Vanderbilt defense-1.4 pts
Vanderbilt offense vs NC State defense+6.6 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 453 mi

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.