Players 2016 final
Running backs — 2016 · ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Scrim/gm | Rush/gm | Car/gm | Rec/gm | Rush yds | YPC | Rush TD | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
PIT | 12 | 83 | 105.7 | 21.8 | 6.2 | 1268 | 4.9 | 7 | 616 | 2 | |
| 2 |
|
DAL | 15 | 80 | 108.7 | 21.5 | 2.1 | 1631 | 5.1 | 15 | 363 | 1 | |
| 3 |
|
ARI | 16 | 89 | 77.4 | 18.3 | 5.0 | 1239 | 4.2 | 16 | 879 | 4 | |
| 4 |
|
LAC | 13 | 76 | 76.7 | 19.5 | 3.2 | 997 | 3.9 | 10 | 419 | 2 | |
| 5 |
|
BUF | 15 | 78 | 84.5 | 15.6 | 3.3 | 1267 | 5.4 | 13 | 356 | 1 | |
| 6 |
|
CHI | 15 | 71 | 87.5 | 16.8 | 1.9 | 1313 | 5.2 | 6 | 298 | 1 | |
| 7 |
|
TEN | 16 | 73 | 80.4 | 18.3 | 3.3 | 1287 | 4.4 | 9 | 377 | 3 | |
| 8 |
|
KC | 14 | 67 | 65.8 | 15.3 | 2.4 | 921 | 4.3 | 3 | 447 | 2 | |
| 9 |
|
ATL | 16 | 74 | 67.4 | 14.2 | 3.4 | 1079 | 4.8 | 11 | 462 | 2 | |
| 10 |
|
MIA | 15 | 69 | 84.8 | 17.3 | 1.8 | 1272 | 4.9 | 8 | 151 | 0 | |
| 11 |
|
HOU | 14 | 64 | 76.6 | 19.1 | 2.2 | 1073 | 4.0 | 5 | 188 | 1 | |
| 12 |
|
SF | 13 | 72 | 76.0 | 16.7 | 2.1 | 988 | 4.6 | 6 | 163 | 3 | |
| 13 |
|
NO | 16 | 69 | 65.2 | 12.8 | 2.9 | 1043 | 5.1 | 6 | 319 | 4 | |
| 14 |
|
IND | 16 | 65 | 64.1 | 16.4 | 2.4 | 1025 | 3.9 | 4 | 277 | 4 | |
| 15 |
|
DEN | 7 | 64 | 62.4 | 15.7 | 2.3 | 437 | 4.0 | 4 | 128 | 1 | |
| 16 |
|
CLE | 16 | 65 | 59.5 | 12.4 | 2.5 | 952 | 4.8 | 7 | 319 | 0 | |
| 17 |
|
GB | 5 | — | 72.0 | 14.2 | 0.8 | 360 | 5.1 | 0 | 28 | 0 | |
| 18 |
|
NYJ | 14 | 63 | 58.1 | 15.6 | 2.1 | 813 | 3.7 | 7 | 263 | 1 | |
| 19 |
|
WAS | 7 | 61 | 65.7 | 14.1 | 1.1 | 460 | 4.6 | 3 | 73 | 0 | |
| 20 |
|
LAR | 16 | 63 | 55.3 | 17.4 | 2.7 | 885 | 3.2 | 6 | 327 | 0 | |
| 21 |
|
LV | 14 | 67 | 56.3 | 13.9 | 2.4 | 788 | 4.0 | 12 | 264 | 0 | |
| 22 |
|
NE | 16 | 70 | 72.6 | 18.7 | 0.4 | 1161 | 3.9 | 18 | 38 | 0 | |
| 23 |
|
DET | 10 | 66 | 35.7 | 9.2 | 5.3 | 357 | 3.9 | 1 | 371 | 5 | |
| 24 |
|
ATL | 13 | 68 | 40.0 | 9.1 | 2.4 | 520 | 4.4 | 8 | 421 | 3 | |
| 25 |
|
TB | 8 | 60 | 52.6 | 18.0 | 1.8 | 421 | 2.9 | 3 | 134 | 0 | |
| 26 |
|
NYJ | 16 | 59 | 45.1 | 8.2 | 3.6 | 722 | 5.5 | 3 | 388 | 2 | |
| 27 |
|
CAR | 13 | 62 | 63.4 | 16.8 | 0.6 | 824 | 3.8 | 9 | 60 | 0 | |
| 28 |
|
CIN | 15 | 61 | 55.9 | 14.8 | 1.4 | 839 | 3.8 | 9 | 174 | 0 | |
| 29 |
|
CIN | 10 | 60 | 33.7 | 9.1 | 3.9 | 337 | 3.7 | 2 | 336 | 1 | |
| 30 |
|
TB | 10 | 56 | 56.0 | 12.9 | 1.3 | 560 | 4.3 | 2 | 98 | 0 | |
| 31 |
|
SEA | 6 | 57 | 28.7 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 172 | 5.7 | 1 | 208 | 0 | |
| 32 |
|
BAL | 16 | 59 | 48.4 | 12.1 | 2.1 | 774 | 4.0 | 5 | 236 | 1 | |
| 33 |
|
NYG | 13 | 57 | 45.6 | 13.9 | 2.7 | 593 | 3.3 | 3 | 201 | 1 | |
| 34 |
|
PHI | 13 | 62 | 50.8 | 11.9 | 1.0 | 661 | 4.3 | 8 | 115 | 1 | |
| 35 |
|
PHI | 15 | 59 | 29.2 | 6.3 | 3.5 | 438 | 4.7 | 2 | 427 | 2 | |
| 36 |
|
PIT | 8 | 58 | 42.9 | 12.2 | 2.2 | 343 | 3.5 | 4 | 118 | 2 | |
| 37 |
|
JAX | 11 | 54 | 39.9 | 10.6 | 1.8 | 439 | 3.8 | 3 | 186 | 0 | |
| 38 |
|
WAS | 14 | 58 | 50.3 | 12.0 | 0.9 | 704 | 4.2 | 6 | 82 | 1 | |
| 39 |
|
DEN | 16 | 55 | 38.2 | 10.9 | 1.9 | 612 | 3.5 | 4 | 265 | 1 | |
| 40 |
|
CLE | 16 | 52 | 22.4 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 358 | 4.9 | 1 | 514 | 0 | |
| 41 |
|
NE | 7 | 50 | 40.4 | 9.1 | 2.4 | 283 | 4.4 | 0 | 94 | 0 | |
| 42 |
|
MIN | 15 | 57 | 35.9 | 10.6 | 2.9 | 539 | 3.4 | 2 | 255 | 2 | |
| 43 |
|
JAX | 15 | 52 | 31.0 | 8.7 | 3.3 | 465 | 3.6 | 1 | 312 | 1 | |
| 44 |
|
NYG | 5 | — | 31.6 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 158 | 4.8 | 1 | 94 | 0 | |
| 45 |
|
SEA | 9 | 53 | 38.8 | 12.1 | 1.4 | 349 | 3.2 | 3 | 96 | 0 | |
| 46 |
|
TB | 7 | 55 | 21.3 | 7.3 | 3.4 | 149 | 2.9 | 1 | 190 | 1 | |
| 47 |
|
DET | 11 | 56 | 30.4 | 8.0 | 1.6 | 334 | 3.8 | 4 | 196 | 0 | |
| 48 |
|
NO | 16 | 51 | 34.2 | 8.3 | 1.4 | 548 | 4.1 | 4 | 200 | 1 | |
| 49 |
|
SEA | 15 | 55 | 38.9 | 9.9 | 1.5 | 583 | 3.9 | 7 | 107 | 1 | |
| 50 |
|
BAL | 12 | 51 | 31.8 | 7.3 | 2.5 | 382 | 4.3 | 2 | 162 | 1 | |
| 51 |
|
NE | 16 | 53 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 166 | 4.3 | 0 | 551 | 5 | |
| 52 |
|
TEN | 14 | 50 | 35.0 | 7.9 | 0.9 | 490 | 4.5 | 5 | 137 | 0 | |
| 53 |
|
LV | 13 | 48 | 35.9 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 467 | 5.4 | 2 | 115 | 0 | |
| 54 |
|
NYG | 14 | 46 | 32.6 | 8.0 | 1.1 | 456 | 4.1 | 0 | 162 | 0 | |
| 55 |
|
WAS | 16 | 54 | 22.2 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 356 | 5.2 | 3 | 349 | 2 | |
| 56 |
|
LV | 16 | 49 | 30.7 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 491 | 5.9 | 1 | 194 | 2 | |
| 57 |
|
BUF | 15 | 54 | 38.5 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 577 | 5.7 | 8 | 50 | 1 | |
| 58 |
|
DET | 9 | 48 | 32.3 | 9.7 | 2.2 | 291 | 3.3 | 1 | 85 | 0 | |
| 59 |
|
MIN | 16 | 52 | 25.1 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 402 | 3.3 | 6 | 263 | 0 | |
| 60 |
|
CIN | 14 | 46 | 24.6 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 344 | 4.6 | 2 | 145 | 0 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2016, ranked by Scrimmage yds/gm. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.