Players 2025 final

1

Ka'imi Fairbairn

HOU· 15 G

44 FG made

2

Jason Myers

SEA· 17 G

41 FG made

3

Cameron Dicker

LAC· 17 G

38 FG made

4

Brandon Aubrey

DAL· 17 G

36 FG made

5

Will Reichard

MIN· 17 G

33 FG made

Kickers — 2025 · ranked by FG made

#	Player	Tm	G	Grade	FG/gm	Att/gm	FGM	FGA	FG%	50+	Long	PAT	Pts/gm
1	Ka'imi Fairbairn	HOU	15	83	2.93	3.20	44	48	91.7%	9	57	28/28	10.7
2	Jason Myers	SEA	17	76	2.41	2.82	41	48	85.4%	9	57	48/48	10.1
3	Cameron Dicker	LAC	17	69	2.24	2.41	38	41	92.7%	5	59	34/35	8.7
4	Brandon Aubrey	DAL	17	72	2.12	2.47	36	42	85.7%	11	64	47/48	9.1
5	Will Reichard	MIN	17	59	1.94	2.06	33	35	94.3%	11	62	31/31	7.6
6	Harrison Butker	KC	17	53	1.94	2.24	33	38	86.8%	5	59	31/35	7.6
7	Chase McLaughlin	TB	17	58	1.88	2.24	32	38	84.2%	11	65	32/33	7.5
8	Tyler Loop	BAL	17	53	1.76	2.00	30	34	88.2%	1	52	44/46	7.9
9	Cam Little	JAX	17	64	1.76	2.00	30	34	88.2%	8	68	50/51	8.2
10	Blake Grupe	NO	16	47	1.81	2.31	29	37	78.4%	7	60	25/25	7.0
11	Nick Folk	NYJ	16	44	1.75	1.81	28	29	96.6%	7	58	22/22	6.6
12	Wil Lutz	DEN	17	48	1.65	1.88	28	32	87.5%	4	57	39/39	7.2
13	Eddy Pineiro	SF	14	67	2.00	2.07	28	29	96.6%	6	59	34/38	8.4
14	Joey Slye	TEN	16	47	1.75	2.19	28	35	80.0%	9	58	26/27	6.9
15	Jake Bates	DET	17	58	1.59	2.00	27	34	79.4%	4	59	54/56	7.9
16	Chris Boswell	PIT	17	51	1.59	1.88	27	32	84.4%	9	60	42/43	7.2
17	Andy Borregales	NE	17	55	1.59	1.88	27	32	84.4%	4	59	53/55	7.9
18	Riley Patterson	MIA	17	42	1.59	1.71	27	29	93.1%	3	54	34/35	6.8
19	Evan McPherson	CIN	17	45	1.47	1.65	25	28	89.3%	5	63	41/44	6.8
20	Chad Ryland	ARI	17	41	1.47	1.94	25	33	75.8%	6	57	36/36	6.5
21	Cairo Santos	CHI	15	52	1.67	2.00	25	30	83.3%	4	54	39/39	7.6
22	Andre Szmyt	CLE	17	31	1.41	1.59	24	27	88.9%	5	55	25/26	5.7
23	Brandon McManus	GB	14	49	1.71	2.14	24	30	80.0%	3	56	32/33	7.4
24	Ryan Fitzgerald	CAR	17	24	1.41	1.71	24	29	82.8%	2	57	27/30	5.8
25	Daniel Carlson	LV	17	17	1.29	1.59	22	27	81.5%	5	60	21/22	5.1
26	Jake Elliott	PHI	17	33	1.18	1.59	20	27	74.1%	4	58	41/42	5.9
27	Zane Gonzalez	ATL	9	65	2.11	2.44	19	22	86.4%	7	56	17/18	8.2
28	Jake Moody	WAS	9	56	2.11	2.56	19	23	82.6%	2	56	15/16	8.0
29	Matt Prater	BUF	15	36	1.20	1.33	18	20	90.0%	1	52	46/49	6.7
30	Matt Gay	WAS	12	38	1.42	1.92	17	23	73.9%	4	56	26/26	6.4
31	Spencer Shrader	IND	5	—	2.60	2.80	13	14	92.9%	1	52	14/14	10.6
32	Charlie Smyth	NO	6	62	2.00	2.67	12	16	75.0%	4	57	13/13	8.2
33	Harrison Mevis	LAR	9	61	1.33	1.44	12	13	92.3%	1	52	39/39	8.3
34	Mike Badgley	IND	9	35	1.22	1.33	11	12	91.7%	2	53	20/25	5.9
35	John Parker Romo	ATL	7	39	1.57	2.00	11	14	78.6%	1	54	12/13	6.4
36	Joshua Karty	LAR	8	43	1.25	1.88	10	15	66.7%	1	51	23/26	6.6
37	Graham Gano	NYG	5	—	1.80	2.00	9	10	90.0%	1	55	9/9	7.2
38	Younghoe Koo	NYG	6	28	1.00	1.50	6	9	66.7%	0	44	13/14	5.2
39	Matthew Wright	WAS	4	—	1.25	1.25	5	5	100.0%	0	46	4/4	4.8
40	Jude McAtamney	NYG	4	—	0.50	0.50	2	2	100.0%	0	31	9/12	3.8

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2025, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.

What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.