Players 2025 final
Quarterbacks — 2025 · ranked by Pass yards
| # | Player | Tm | G | Grade | Yds/gm | Att/gm | Yds | TD | INT | Cmp% | Y/A | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LAR | 17 | 77 | 276.9 | 35.1 | 46 | 8 | 65.0% | 7.9 | 1 | |
| 2 |
|
DET | 17 | 67 | 268.5 | 34.0 | 34 | 8 | 68.0% | 7.9 | 45 | |
| 3 |
|
DAL | 17 | 71 | 267.8 | 35.3 | 30 | 10 | 67.3% | 7.6 | 177 | |
| 4 |
|
NE | 17 | 84 | 258.5 | 28.9 | 31 | 8 | 72.0% | 8.9 | 450 | |
| 5 |
|
SEA | 17 | 52 | 238.1 | 28.1 | 25 | 14 | 67.7% | 8.5 | 95 | |
| 6 |
|
JAX | 17 | 64 | 235.7 | 32.9 | 29 | 12 | 60.9% | 7.2 | 359 | |
| 7 |
|
CHI | 17 | 59 | 231.9 | 33.4 | 27 | 7 | 58.1% | 6.9 | 383 | |
| 8 |
|
DEN | 17 | 60 | 231.2 | 36.0 | 25 | 11 | 63.4% | 6.4 | 356 | |
| 9 |
|
LAC | 16 | 56 | 232.9 | 32.0 | 26 | 13 | 66.4% | 7.3 | 498 | |
| 10 |
|
TB | 17 | 54 | 217.2 | 31.9 | 26 | 11 | 63.2% | 6.8 | 382 | |
| 11 |
|
BUF | 16 | 74 | 229.2 | 28.8 | 25 | 10 | 69.3% | 8.0 | 579 | |
| 12 |
|
KC | 14 | 69 | 256.2 | 35.9 | 22 | 11 | 62.7% | 7.1 | 422 | |
| 13 |
|
GB | 15 | 57 | 225.4 | 29.3 | 23 | 6 | 66.3% | 7.7 | 199 | |
| 14 |
|
ARI | 14 | 53 | 240.4 | 34.6 | 23 | 8 | 64.9% | 6.9 | 168 | |
| 15 |
|
PIT | 16 | 49 | 207.6 | 31.1 | 24 | 7 | 65.7% | 6.7 | 61 | |
| 16 |
|
PHI | 16 | 62 | 201.5 | 28.4 | 25 | 6 | 64.8% | 7.1 | 421 | |
| 17 |
|
TEN | 17 | 33 | 186.4 | 31.8 | 15 | 7 | 59.8% | 5.9 | 159 | |
| 18 |
|
IND | 13 | 63 | 238.5 | 29.5 | 19 | 8 | 68.0% | 8.1 | 164 | |
| 19 |
|
HOU | 14 | 51 | 217.2 | 30.2 | 19 | 8 | 64.5% | 7.2 | 209 | |
| 20 |
|
LV | 15 | 36 | 201.7 | 29.9 | 19 | 17 | 67.4% | 6.8 | 109 | |
| 21 |
|
CAR | 16 | 44 | 188.2 | 29.9 | 23 | 11 | 63.6% | 6.3 | 216 | |
| 22 |
|
MIA | 14 | 43 | 190.0 | 27.4 | 20 | 15 | 67.7% | 6.9 | 43 | |
| 23 |
|
BAL | 13 | 55 | 196.1 | 23.2 | 21 | 7 | 63.6% | 8.4 | 349 | |
| 24 |
|
CLE | 13 | 37 | 190.7 | 32.0 | 15 | 10 | 60.3% | 6.0 | 35 | |
| 25 |
|
NO | 11 | 47 | 216.7 | 29.7 | 10 | 6 | 67.6% | 7.3 | 186 | |
| 26 |
|
NYG | 14 | 54 | 162.3 | 24.2 | 15 | 5 | 63.7% | 6.7 | 487 | |
| 27 |
|
SF | 9 | 65 | 240.8 | 31.6 | 20 | 10 | 69.4% | 7.6 | 147 | |
| 28 |
|
SF | 11 | 48 | 195.5 | 26.3 | 13 | 6 | 69.6% | 7.4 | 60 | |
| 29 |
|
ATL | 9 | 46 | 220.2 | 30.7 | 9 | 3 | 60.1% | 7.2 | 70 | |
| 30 |
|
CIN | 8 | 58 | 226.1 | 32.4 | 17 | 5 | 66.8% | 7.0 | 41 | |
| 31 |
|
ATL | 10 | 40 | 172.1 | 26.9 | 10 | 5 | 61.7% | 6.4 | 7 | |
| 32 |
|
WAS | 10 | 46 | 169.5 | 22.7 | 10 | 7 | 61.2% | 7.5 | 297 | |
| 33 |
|
MIN | 10 | 35 | 163.2 | 24.3 | 11 | 12 | 57.6% | 6.7 | 181 | |
| 34 |
|
NO | 9 | 41 | 176.2 | 28.6 | 8 | 5 | 67.7% | 6.2 | 167 | |
| 35 |
|
CLE | 8 | 29 | 175.0 | 26.5 | 7 | 10 | 56.6% | 6.6 | 169 | |
| 36 |
|
WAS | 7 | 50 | 180.3 | 26.9 | 8 | 3 | 60.6% | 6.7 | 278 | |
| 37 |
|
NYJ | 9 | 45 | 139.9 | 22.7 | 7 | 1 | 62.7% | 6.2 | 383 | |
| 38 |
|
MIN | 5 | — | 243.2 | 33.8 | 6 | 5 | 65.1% | 7.2 | 57 | |
| 39 |
|
ARI | 5 | — | 192.4 | 32.2 | 6 | 3 | 68.3% | 6.0 | 173 | |
| 40 |
|
CLE | 10 | 26 | 93.7 | 18.5 | 7 | 2 | 59.5% | 5.1 | 86 | |
| 41 |
|
HOU | 6 | 42 | 152.5 | 26.5 | 5 | 1 | 57.2% | 5.8 | 60 | |
| 42 |
|
NYG | 6 | 31 | 138.5 | 19.8 | 3 | 3 | 58.0% | 7.0 | 106 | |
| 43 |
|
NYJ | 6 | 38 | 129.8 | 22.3 | 5 | 5 | 59.7% | 5.8 | 143 | |
| 44 |
|
CIN | 5 | — | 154.2 | 25.0 | 6 | 8 | 64.8% | 6.2 | 39 | |
| 45 |
|
NYJ | 5 | — | 147.8 | 30.6 | 2 | 7 | 57.5% | 4.8 | 49 | |
| 46 |
|
MIA | 4 | — | 155.5 | 20.8 | 3 | 3 | 66.3% | 7.5 | 19 | |
| 47 |
|
BAL | 5 | — | 85.2 | 13.4 | 2 | 0 | 77.6% | 6.4 | 151 | |
| 48 |
|
GB | 4 | — | 105.5 | 8.8 | 3 | 0 | 85.7% | 12.1 | 123 | |
| 49 |
|
IND | 5 | — | 83.0 | 13.4 | 2 | 3 | 58.2% | 6.2 | 27 | |
| 50 |
|
MIN | 7 | 16 | 46.9 | 10.1 | 0 | 4 | 66.2% | 4.6 | 11 | |
| 51 |
|
BUF | 4 | — | 78.2 | 8.8 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% | 8.9 | 6 | |
| 52 |
|
PIT | 5 | — | 62.0 | 10.4 | 2 | 2 | 73.1% | 6.0 | 6 | |
| 53 |
|
BAL | 4 | — | 75.8 | 13.0 | 0 | 4 | 65.4% | 5.8 | -4 | |
| 54 |
|
CAR | 4 | — | 73.2 | 9.2 | 1 | 1 | 67.6% | 7.9 | -2 | |
| 55 |
|
PHI | 4 | — | 68.5 | 10.8 | 1 | 1 | 55.8% | 6.4 | 8 | |
| 56 |
|
LAC | 4 | — | 56.5 | 14.2 | 0 | 1 | 47.4% | 4.0 | 85 | |
| 57 |
|
LV | 6 | 23 | 31.3 | 7.5 | 1 | 2 | 62.2% | 4.2 | 22 | |
| 58 |
|
DAL | 4 | — | 45.8 | 6.0 | 1 | 2 | 62.5% | 7.6 | 50 | |
| 59 |
|
NE | 4 | — | 16.2 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 70.0% | 6.5 | -5 | |
| 60 |
|
KC | 4 | — | 9.2 | 3.2 | 0 | 1 | 46.2% | 2.8 | 2 |
What this is. Finished box-score production from 2025, ranked by Pass yards. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 4 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.
What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.
About the grade. 0–100, where 50 is average for the position and 85+ is elite. It is box production, scaled by the defense it came against, pulled toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so a 90 quarterback and a 90 kicker are each elite for their own spot and are not comparable to each other in any other way. It needs 6 games, so players below that show — rather than a number built on a hot month.
What the grade can’t see. There is no charting behind it, so it rewards production over technique: the receiver who ran the route that freed someone else, and the back who picked up the blitz, get nothing for it. It is role-dependent by construction — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers are not opponent-adjusted, because field goals are contested by distance and weather, not by the defense across the ball. And it grades a season already played; it is not a projection of the next one.
Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.