Players 2016 final postseason

1

Chris Boswell

PIT· 3 G

8 FG made

2

Stephen Gostkowski

NE· 3 G

7 FG made

3

Nick Novak

HOU· 2 G

5 FG made

4

Steven Hauschka

SEA· 2 G

4 FG made

5

Dan Bailey

DAL· 1 G

3 FG made

Kickers — 2016 · ranked by FG made

#	Player	Tm	G	FG/gm	Att/gm	FGM	FGA	FG%	50+	Long	PAT	Pts/gm
1	Chris Boswell	PIT	3	2.67	2.67	8	8	100.0%	0	45	3/5	9.0
2	Stephen Gostkowski	NE	3	2.33	2.33	7	7	100.0%	0	47	7/9	9.3
3	Nick Novak	HOU	2	2.50	2.50	5	5	100.0%	1	50	4/4	9.5
4	Steven Hauschka	SEA	2	2.00	2.00	4	4	100.0%	0	43	4/5	8.0
5	Dan Bailey	DAL	1	3.00	3.00	3	3	100.0%	2	52	2/2	11.0
6	Mason Crosby	GB	3	1.00	1.33	3	4	75.0%	2	56	10/10	6.3
7	Matt Bryant	ATL	3	1.00	1.00	3	3	100.0%	0	35	13/14	7.3
8	Matt Prater	DET	1	2.00	2.00	2	2	100.0%	2	53	0/0	6.0
9	Robbie Gould	NYG	1	2.00	2.00	2	2	100.0%	0	40	1/1	7.0
10	Andrew Franks	MIA	1	2.00	2.00	2	2	100.0%	0	47	0/0	6.0
11	Cairo Santos	KC	1	1.00	1.00	1	1	100.0%	0	48	1/1	4.0
12	Sebastian Janikowski	LV	1	0.00	0.00	0	0	—	0	—	2/2	2.0

What this is. Finished box-score production from 2016, ranked by FG made. Per-game columns divide by games played, not games on the schedule, so a player who missed time is measured on the games he was in — and his season totals still show the games he missed. Minimum 1 games to be ranked, otherwise one big afternoon tops every list.

What it isn’t. None of this is a projection, a pick, or a prop recommendation — it is what already happened. Last season’s rate is a starting point for what a player does in a game, not a forecast of the next one: offense, role, and health all move underneath it. Target share and WOPR describe a player’s share of his own team’s passing game, so they compare roles, not players across teams.

Regular season and postseason are kept separate on purpose. Playoff samples are small and the opponents are better; blending them into a season rate quietly flatters the players who got there. The grade is regular-season only, so it is not offered on the postseason split.